>be sivaji>best king of all india, defeating mughal forces>brahmins say u are shudra and cant become king kek>be dogra king>want to convert kashmiri muslims back to hinduism>brahmins reject cuz they cant be put back into caste system
kek yaar this is why I support neo hindu movements like arya samaj, brahmins cant accept the fact that literally all hindu kings from chandragupta, krishnadevaraya and shivaji are shudras
>>833
But shivaji did end up getting coronated by brahmins despite the shitfest. And his coronation was not only opposed by orthodox brahmins but also by fellow maratha chiefs who were jealous of his growing power.
>>833
Brahmins are the biggest enemy of Hinduism
They Just LARP and do weird sort of mental gymnastics to stay in power
>Inb4 brahmin contribution in history, art and sciences
Fuck you , average ponga is nothing but a kanger
I argue against this but then i realise how a shudra made entire "normalise eating cow meat", thread and i think they were right to do so. Even Sivaji claimed to be Kshatriya in the end anyways, its just a forced cope of maharastra politics.
I dont want Muzzies to suddenly be same as me because they all felt Thursday was a good day to not be spineless any more. We all need less hindus with more Hindutva, rarher than vice versa. Anyone who hates them, likely does so because of inferiority complex. Even half of the shit against them here is mostly just baits tbh.
>>835
Thats what most kings throughout history did. Invent genealogies to legitimise their rule. Upstart rajputs did the same in history hence all the cooked up stories about descending from kangz and gods.
>>839
This. Why do people skip this conveniently, it would be a non issue if he only did it to muslims, he was doing it to hindus, that is the problem. His army did not even give two shits about faith, it was about power and empire for them. Sure he himself may have cared, but rest of them were literally no different from Muslims.
>>842
people have been mind raped by lindutva, chuhaji was not fighting for linduism or whatever lmao, he was an upstart bandit, his father was a low ranking mercenary who worked for mughal administration.
>>841
>Few>Kek>Lmao even<Bargi raids in Bengal (1742–1751): Estimated 350,000–400,000 civilian deaths, the vast majority being Hindu
Mughals and Muslims would get on their knees and suck Sivaji off to learn how he managed to pull what even they could not, killing hindus openly kek
>>842
https://youtu.be/t2PM937gvjA?si=K06yX-btThWV5jjBhttps://youtu.be/t2PM937gvjA?si=K06yX-btThWV5jjB
Stop falling for muzzie and libbu propaganda
>>843
Abey ganwar fighting for empire and fighting for hinduism are not mutually exclusive. Mughals also fought for power but also pushed for islam. Marathas liberated many places from centuries of islamic rule and demolished mosques built on temples and rebuilt temples like kashi vishwanath
>>843
Seperating politics from fairh is essential for this very reason. Religion is not some convenient tool, nor is it meant to be for elites to get away with raping innocent women or little girls. This was one of the biggest atrocities of "muh hindu army" did against civilians, guess what, most of the said victims were also Shudras, not some elites.
things like coronation, royalty etc weren't just memes for show back then, pajeet kangers do not understand this, there was law and protocol, not any one who looted few villages could claim to be a kang, that isn't how it worked.
Infact Rajputs were never coronated by Brahmins, they had their own traditions and priests Rajpurohits and some other Nobels would generally do the coronation.
So this whole brahmin ne taaj nahi pehnaya saar is a meme, truth is no one accepted chuhaji as a kang, not the people he looted, not the contemporary powers and many of his own people were against him
>>845
>Stop falling for muzzie and libbu propaganda
You're a fucking retard, underage bhangi, read a book or two, not everything us muh "muzzie" muh "libbu". Reality is grim, their has always been traitors among us, and his army did not share his grand vision nor his sentiments, guess why turning pesants in elite class en-masse backfires, this is why
>Dutch East India Company factory in Bengal and Bihar, estimated that 400,000 civilians in Western Bengal and Bihar died in the overall conflict.[3][4] (approx. 1.4% of Bengal's population killed.)[5]< pp. 359–360 "The head merchant at the Dutch factory in Bengal guessed that 'close to 400,000 people were killed in Bengal and Bihar' during the Maratha invasions. If 350,000 of those deaths were in Bengal and if Bengal's population had been 24 million or so at the start, that would suggest 14 out of every 1,000 people died."
This is JUST one of them, JUST one.
>>845
chuhaji never had an empire retard, he was literally a bandit who took over few villages and forts, you have been mind raped by lindutva to see everything from a linduism point of view.
The reason for "linduism" still being alive today is bhikhari pongas who refused to give up their religion and actual kings like Jai Singh and Emperor Akbar.
>>847
>Infact Rajputs were never coronated by Brahmins, they had their own traditions and priests Rajpurohits and some other Nobels would generally do the coronation.
The biggest issue here is Rajput never had any animosity towards them, even today not every Rajput wears bamboo thread or anything like that. Brahmins dont come to rajputs and go "REEE YOU HAVE TO BE A VEDIC Kshatriya" lmao. Getting mad over a nothing burger. If you are a warrior, you are a warrior, if you are king, you are a king.
The entire hate is so forced and desperate. Imagine being mad because some priest of some village did not go out of his way to consider you "Kshatriya" how insecure are you all? Its the fact that no one considered him a good king due to actions of his army its that simple.
>>849
Literally fucking this, who cares about a simple priest anyways, ses this shit just comes from how much you value fairh. If is not like any king was rubbing his head under feets of a Brahmin or anything. It is no different from visiting a shrine and being civil to a purohit. Realistically the faith would have gone away if Akbar was not reasonable. You have some brahmins who dont have anything except faith so they will stubbornly stick to it, seething over them, to create some jew equall, literal mind rape.
>>851
Imagine thousand years from now, people look at coronary title like president and we get mad at president for state this shithole is in. "President ne Modi ko ye mahi karne diya" lmao yaar. Limited analogy, but i hope it gets my point across. I blame kanger pongas but most of them are not even pongas. People need to start taking the internet less seriously.
>>848
>Look Saar people died in wars saar so that means marathas are bad saar.
First of all you are quoting exaggerated figure purely based on guesswork.
Secondly, when india liberated bangladesh many bangladeshis died in process, does it mean india was bad. It was collateral damage nigga. Maratha invasion of bengal compelled nawab to cede odisha to marathas. Marathas reopened jagannath and rath yatra after centuries of ban during muslim rule. It was such a W for hindus and cucks and muzzies want to gaslight others about marathas being bad. They cant tolerate a hindu hero in history because it goes against their narrative. It was obvious hindu reconquista but they want us to think it was just plunder.
>>849
He kickstarted the maratha empire tho with deccan war against mughals. It further expanded after his death.
>Kills thousands of hindus>You all lindus are welcome
Lindus are fucking retarded, also yes allah sasti randi ka pilla, no one here is a muslim yaar get it through your head, you all need to grow the fuck up.
>in early 1900s. On January 3rd, 1792, during the 3rd Anglo-Mysore War, the Maratha Army under Parshuram Bhau destroyed 6,000 houses and abducted women, according to an eyewitness account.<Proud warriors of Incelputana giving the maratha sariya to hindu women
Lmao yaar, what is this plebbit? Leave your echo chamber, all kings had some skeleton in their closet.
