>let all the periyarists, feminists, ambedkarites be separated from civilized society
oh wait, their subhuman genes all trace back to bangladesh kek
dravidian dalits -> slaves bought into south india by brahmins (periyarist)
feminists-> mostly ugly and swarthy like kanglus
>78% muslims have dalit and kanglu ancestory in india, rest have uc and 0.1% are true turks and persians
>>495
u must be dumb but there's a reason why india was better society when the aryan brahmins controlled those dalit subhumans into submission.
Now they all converted to islam and shat on the beautiful street of india. fuck u white man for brining equality here
>>497
Wasn't me nor my kin, we warned you about anglos and their jewish servitude, you not only didn't listened but you failed to remove barely a few thousands of them with millions of yours.
sigh
War is your weakness, you're bad at it, at least your arrogance is predictable, like all the other browns, do not complain when you will have re awakened the bloodlust of the White man.
>>502
You need to understand that Lundia had never before been a real nation state, it were just certain caste's or foreign invaders taking dominance for a short period of time and then eventually erroding, this left no time for national integration... honestly I wish one of them just genocided the rest, would've been a better fate for "India" in the modern day, nothing wrong with wishing so, all developed nations had that period, the Jews invented international law and human rights to stop us from developing.
>>503
+ I mean the Brits didn't beat "India" they "conquered" a hundred smaller kingdoms being ruled by docile kings who wanted a new overlord because the last empire met its end and now there's a huge power vacuum. There were only 2 "empires" in India capable of fighting the Brits, and both of them were in decline from fighting each other for 100s of years.
>>503
The French invented international laws and Human rights, we also propelled it worldwide with the abolishment of kings, queens and hierarchy by birth rather than merit (an effective system when dealing with honorable people but ripe for abuse)
The jews weren't a major problem until roughly 1890 when they started to cease infighting and started dealing in nepotism, ingroup favoritism (ironic when you're a rootless nomad) and off course, loxism.
Napoléon offered the jews of France to either give up their religion or to fuck off, Hitler used other methods, etc...
>>505
I don't think any of us have a choice in that matter, muslims will always use the good will of the local population and as their number grows will make demands, by the time they reach a critical mass of about 20% of the general population they'll make demands so outlandish they will be refused, kockstarting a civil war, this pattern have been repeating itself for almost 1400 years.
What is concerning nowadays are weapons of mass destruction, no tabula rasa this time...
>>506
Nukes are overrated actually, for one a rational state actor would never use them on countervalue targets, and second except the US and Russia no one really has weapons of neither enough yield not of enough quantity to be a real threat.
>>506
Every political movement ever has always larped up with those words since they sound cool and help mobilize the normies, but the current global system and all the liberal democratic brainwashing with human rights, international law and other delusions is purely a Judeo-American spawn.
