>>949
Abe CHUTIYE visual description nam ki cheez suni hai? They all are put in very detailed manner in their own segments. How do you think when the live adaptation for any auto biography happens people get characters who look like real thing even if no one has seen them? Visual description.
>>966
>How us thr physics wrong?
Physique anon, not physics. The design is good, the proportion is where he messed up because of the language barrier.
such as "Gauranga" he is a shade that is between white and gold, and gis body literally towers inhumanely. He did get armour right, which is very very important detail.
This confusion comes from other characters like Arjuna being dark skinned so most artist assume others were as well. But this is the vital difference, Arjuna took after this god father indea making him dark skinned.
Another mistake is "Mahabahu" he us meant to literally make other look like they are minihumans to some degree. It probably was an attempt and him humanising him. He was meant to be a cut above human beings, his fall is meant to show he is a Titan, not just an old man.
>Also the he draws these as per his sastra description. His words
No no, i agree with that i saw that all clearly myself, they are good. I am just pointing out very few parts where he messed up, otherwise these are very cool.
>Also whenever you see in daily slope tv is not much accurate
Abe pajeet, puran padh bhi liya kar yaar kabhi. How the fuck are you all not capable of reading one solid work of mythos our theology gave us, kya haal hai hindus ka bhi.
