[Index] [Catalog] [Bottom] R: 15 / P: 7 / Connecting

File: IMG_3748.jpeg (250.2KB, 1170x680)
Post Image
Tajiks are half bmac and half steppe . Iranians are half bmac/zagros and half anatolian farmer.(and also- 8-10% natufian and chg) Both the ethnicities are way better looking and more white than us. Both are these groups represent indians if they didnt have “AASI”. Iranians are even considered really high iq. The maid that comes to my house is from some kind of SC community, i dont even hate her but the disgust her AASI face gives me is beyond comprehension .
File: IMG_3747.jpeg (301.3KB, 1170x801)
Post Image
>>94935 Iranian football team This is how average iranian looks like. They qualified for the world cup despite being under a brutal war and sanctions for more than a decade.
File: Vf5643rch6t.jpg (146.4KB, 708x1042)
Post Image
>>94935 >Both are these groups represent indians if they didnt have “AASI. Nope. Different pheno is primarily due to difference in climate and factors like genetic drift. Aasi itself is a meme. Its a hypothetical ghost population. Any lineage they dont identify is counted as aasi.
only a dehati jhaat/poojar can do this kind of faggot-coded kanging day and night.
>>94941 Dont cherrypick show me a how an average chitpavan brahmin looks (theres one famous example on twitter too ) You and i both know how the average konkan brahmins looks . Brahmins in mahar rashtra still look better on average though.
>>94935 I agree what you mean by the maid disgusts you, I am southie and yet I experience that visceral disgust when looking at sweepers and poor people. However I think it is more due to diet and lifestyle, they have malnutritioned since birth. I don’t think it has to do with AASI, every tall Dravidian I’ve met is usually dark skinned, wheatish Dravidians like me are usually medium to short in hight.
File: S23edvht34tg.jpg (205.4KB, 705x1079)
Post Image
>>94948 You are not getting the point. South indians are dark because they have evolved closer to equator. It has nothing to do with AASI which is a hypothetical ghost population they have no evidence of.
>>94950 Aasi in north more uglier than aasi in south.
>>94954 exactly. give lundians anything scientific sounding and they lap it up and parrot it forever for free
>>94954 I know a yajnadevam and also know that aasi is different for all places and also that aasi is amalgamation of many races . I know genetics
>>94954 Yajna and the guy are just coping.
>>94960 >aasi is amalgamation of many races. Sort of but not exactly. There have never been a pure aasi population to begin with. Indians are just iranians who migrated eastwards and got genetically drifted as a result. This genetic drift is what these mathematical models are showing as aasi but there has never been an aasi race which is why they have to do all sorts of mental gymnastics like using super isolated populations like Onge or paniya as proxies and force fitting every unidentified component into aasi. They have not even found a pure aasi specimen because it never existed.
>considered really high iq So are tambrahms
>>94971 >Indians are just iranians who migrated eastwards Acc to me its the other way around. Also like you mentioned no pure aasi samples there also have been no pure basal Eurasian samples which is found in zagros neolithic farmer.
>>94976 When out of africa migration happened movement must have been from iran to india
>>94935 >>94940 Indian UCs are ancestors of these steppe rape babies

[Post Reply]
[Index] [Catalog] [Top] R: 15 / P: 7 / Connecting

Theme: