>>91449
Not really, chances are someome of royal decree would be draped from head to toe, the problem is that they are apprpaching it with "modesty" angle
>>91439
>>91441
>>91444
>>91471
>>91473
This is retarded. They weren't just "without blouse" back then. They were literally topless.
Hanuman straight-up describes Sita's nipples in Valmiki Ramayana.
>"These two breasts of yours are rotund, rubbing & bumping each other, they're swinging up & up, their nipples are brawny & jutting out, & they are smoothish like palm-fruits"
Even the Vijayanagara Empresses as late as the 1500s were topless.
Its true
“Her face shone like the full moon and she possessed beautiful brows and gracefully rounded breasts; by her radiance she dispelled the darkness in all regions; her neck was of a bluish tint, her lips like the Bimba fruit, her waist slender…”
>>91511
>>91568
There's also this
>Your vulva/pubic mound is broad and fleshy; your two thighs resemble elephants’ trunks, being well-developed, rounded, close together, and boldly formed.
Sita has a fat pussy confirmed.
>>91627
Shut up, retard. Go pray to some Abrahamic god or something.
Our gods are naked and proud. We literally worship the penis (lingam) and the pussy (yoni), the progenitors of life.
We don't demonize sex and nudity like abracucks.
