>>74437
You dont. You dont fight a armed person, unarmed yourself. Best you can do is to be big af, and block your head with arms and barriage straight. But thats if your big af
>>74451
Yeah i figured, i see those i will run for my life, thats what they teach you in any combat sport, we are not some muh "tere bhai ko laal dikhta hai" most jeets dont know what they are doing, if opponent is armed back the fuck up
>>74451
Brvtal reality is you cannot fight an armed person, even if you are 6’6 Icelandic chad, a 5’3 bimaru with a knife will kill you 90% of the time.
>>74464
Even if you are armed blade length really matters a lot. A guy with a knife can never win against a guy with a sword, and a guy with a sword cannot win against a spearman, it really is that brutal.
>>74471
I dont think so. spears need formation its not automatic win but yea swords would probably fuckup knife wielders. Its probably why rowdys carry machete
>>74478
Knife is more dangerous than swords. Its faster, swifter and sneakier, Unblockable. You can see a sword and run away. Nigrs would have knife up their ass and fool you into believing they are all arms. Cover your head and the sword will stop at your arm bone. Knife will find a way to your neck. One swift and its over.
>knife is mightier than sword type shi
In reality fights occur spontaneously unless you challenged someone and they grab you by throat and beat you by punching (rare for jeets) and slapping you(still rare for jeets), so yes, you will never get to use nunnchuks in reality, let alone be given time to build the momentum and motion.
>>74504
from experience in fights throughout childhood and in kalej. its way too fast. you are a feet away and other person just jumps on you in 2 seconds.
i am not saying nunchuks arent dangerous but good luck pulling them out when other person also has your throat in one hand or has landed a punch of two on you and you lost control.