>Research indicates that the majority of women in India's brothel-based sex trade—such as in Mumbai’s Kamathipura and Kolkata's Sonagachi—belong to lower castes and Dalit communities
chamar ki origin story
isnt the fact that they are mullis mean they were once raped by mughals?
the caste remains LC/pasmanda/chamar.
dalits are oppressed no matter what they do , even the umbrella of islam or christianity cant save them .
how did this happen?
how can a race be so incompetent?
>>72293
They weren't raped. They were poor and just converted to avoid jizya or other incentives. Mughals never had enough numbers to leave behind a significant genetic footprint. They ruled as elite in delhi making 0.001% of india's population. Only the highest of high royal clans had their daughters married to mughals which the mughals demanded to ensure loyalty. 99.9% of jeets regardless of caste never even saw a foreigner or mughal.
>>72365
Also mughal harem had just 300 wives or concubines at best. All those ridiculous inflated figures like 5000 women in harem is due to counting the women servants, administrative staff and emperor's mother, sisters, daughters, aunts etc. Harem just meant women's quarters. Even female family members of emperor lived in harem
>>72274
they also get perma secluded from their own caste unlike savarna rands who are openly embraced by savarna cucks. I feel shameful calling myself a savarna as I must share my caste name with other cuckolds. brutalida desu
>>72377
mughal harems mostly had persian, gujjar and jat concubines
>>72444
no they don't many bhangi tribes and castes literally have culture of pimping, entire such villages exist, they sell their daughters to the highest bidder
