[Index] [Catalog] [Bottom] R: 18 / P: 8 / Connecting

File: ClipboardImage.png (195.4KB, 480x480)
Post Image
What a kekworthy image
>>57921 posting this on bhach would get you banned lmao
>>57947 Kek He would’ve rangebanned us
>>57921 >Blue Chakra for the Dalits >Dalits clean feces of other >Placed on poop hole location >Place where feces comes out Jai bhim yaro
>>57956 As much as i hated it, I am nostalgic for it. There were actually non-retarded anons back there, who could engage in discussions. The man was clearly doing something right.
>>57962 kek
>>57973 Indus is trying to force a bhach 2.0 it wont happen tho, it will never happen again
>>57983 it is the same entity running all these sites yaar anon
>>57973 The site was good, it just never found the right audience, shilling it brought a lot of retards, not shillong it killed the activity, he did everything right, it was not his fault
>>57983 Bhach was its own thing. Nothing like it before nor after. >>58018 >he did everything right, it was not his fault I can think of two mistakes which he did: 1)Having terrible moderation, jannies were incompetent as fuck 2)At one point, when 4chan shut down due to the sharty hack, he implemented some kind of 24 hour new user timer (which often didn't work) and basically killed the site, at a time when there was a mass exodus of 4chan users. He later stopped it but the damage was done.
>>58023 Maybe he wanted to prevent spam, but he should have let it be untill we saw some migration
>>57983 it can definitely happen just need new anons >t.beef thread enjoyer
>>58028 >beef thread enjoyer The induschan one? What a kino, high IQ thread.
>>58028 Beefthread would've been nvked after the opening post on bhach.
>>58044 Did not that anon start posting rule 34 of hindu gods? I dont need that degree of freedom, where it becomes pure retardation
>>58046 No, I don't think we are talking about the same thread or referencing the same anon. Can you state what the beef thread was exactly? Just so that we know we're talking about the same thing.
>>58006 If that's true how unemployed can that person be?
>>58047 I think you are referring to the thread on savarkarite hinduism on why killing and eating cow is ok, i am saying the same anon started posting rule 34 of hinduism figures in other threads
>>58055 Yes, I was the OP. No, I did not start posting r34 of hinduism figures in the other threads, that was another anon.

[Post Reply]
[Index] [Catalog] [Top] R: 18 / P: 8 / Connecting

Theme: