[Index] [Catalog] [Bottom] R: 18 / P: 11 / Connecting

File: 1784035837001947741.jpeg (335.0KB, 1079x873)
Post Image
mfw when all nations had caste hierarchy and slavery but only pajeets are this retarded to have someone like ambedkar to divide society even more kek cant we all just be indian rather than ur useless division of brahcuck and daleet
File: ClipboardImage.png (66.1KB, 225x225)
Post Image
>>54629 Yaar dalit
>>54629 He was a british creation.
>>54629 >Ambedkar divided socitey Irony, satire? Or u just stupid
>>54632 More like jewish
File: 1252874-3840x2160-desktop-4k-n(...) (2.0MB, 3840x2160)
Post Image
>>54629 i'm a baman. i went to my gaon in 7th grade, all these supposed "superior" caste people were more jungli than the worst dehatis i had ever met. literally unironically inviting me to take a shit in the wheat fields. i've also seen dehatis living in jhopdis and posting about LGBT acceptance on their instagrams. nothing surprises me anymore. it's all about IQ and looks. if you have enough of those two, get the fuck out of the country. all the smart people are leaving. no one's coming back.
>>54633 Chamar, the conflict in manipur is because those meities dont get sc status like kukis
>>54639 SWOL?
>>54633 Bait
>>54629 Gave pajeet democracy, they made a complete shit show out of it
>>54629 Indian hindus dont even have slavery there is no sanskrit word for slave nor a legal framework for it
>>54647 Dalits are pretty much equivalent of a slave, when indians went to war they dint enslave local population like others kek they just fought for land and money
>>54647 lmao my dad was saying the same bullshit yesterday >HUMARE HINDI BHASHA MEIN TALAKH KE LIYE KOI SHABD HI NAHI HAI >TALAKH TOH URDU SHABD HAI >REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>54649 no they arent "dalit" is just a relative social standing a landowner has no legal ownership of a dalit slave means you are legally owned by somebody else the concept of owning another human does not exist in ancient Indian history
>>54651 Dalits arent citizens neither could own land back in ancient india they had no rights
>>54645 Democracy is only for homogeneous high trust high iq population not a low trust 10k ethnicity country like india
>>54653 still not owned by somebody which is the main requirement of a slave just because your life is shitty doesnt make you a slave slavery is much stronger, most indians have no idea what it actually means kek
File: download (2).png (547.6KB, 500x893)
Post Image
@admin ban swisscuck
>>54639 Well there are bhungis in dehat they shit all over fields while most of bamas have built toilets since years, these chamroids were even given khets during Indra gandhi's land grand schemes, but they still in our khets as our khets are nearer to village.

[Post Reply]
[Index] [Catalog] [Top] R: 18 / P: 11 / Connecting

Theme: