Bhosadpillers think if aasi never existed, indians would look like chads. These retards don't understand AASI is not even a distinct homogenous population who had some common phenotype. The actual problem was the geography and tropical climate (proximity to equator) which selected for dark skin and subhuman features.
If the section of indian landmass above the red line only existed and the part below it never existed, we would not have as many subhumans.
>>42096
>If the section of indian landmass above the red line only existed and the part below it never existed, we would not have as many subhumans.
Its quite the opposite.
>Street Shitters>Ayurveda believers>Low IQ dehaties>Turk rape babies
are all from north region above the red line
look at the bigger picture, the creator of this world created mountainous boundary for a reason. it was to protect the rest of the world from this shithole. you shitheads flinging shit at each other is irrelevant, you are both fecaloids.
>>42099
>>42101
Aryan kangers who are pajeet are the most dysgenic subhumans. I btfo’d a kanger in the other thread; he was unable to accept that it was my hand and too pussy to post his.
>>42098
If aasi was inherently subhuman, kashmiris and himachalis would have been uglier than punjabis as they have higher aasi but since it is adapted to local climate, it does not look subhuman.
>>42099
Looks >>>> money
Japan and skorea are high gdp but i would pick being a iranian, georgian, belarusian over being a gook anyday. At least i will look better and get better looking foids to fuck.
>>42101
Only bimaru states have those issues and half of the bimaru belt is below the red line. JK, Punjab, HP, UK, Haryana mog your abbolands in every metric. Even pakis can easily mog if not for pisslam and them being hellbent on war with india holding them back.
