[Index] [Catalog] [Bottom] R: 11 / P: 3 / Connecting

File: IMG_20260701_000951.jpg (2.8MB, 1834x3766)
Post Image
There were 5 primary aryan tribes that came abt into India Yadu, Anu, Druhyu, Puru, Bharata These followed tribal systems and were differnet tribes In tribe too varna system People from the same aryan tribes divide them into priests, rulers, scholars etc etc. Earlier these were fluid then over time became rigid. So from same homogenus aryans some became bhramins or priests, kshtriyas vishayas and so on So from all tribes these groups were made into. Outside these were chamars, the original inhabitants of these lands. Moolnivasis So different bhramins around India have no shared past. They are just individuals which got that role in their own Aryan tribe and rest got too Only some castes remain that have direct leniage from the Aryan tribes 1) Yadu - Ahirs / yadavs ( aryan tribe in gangetic planes) 2) Puru & Bharata - Rajputs ( aryan tribe thst settled in north ) 3) communities that came into being from Anu & Druhyu - Punjabi, Jat, and Khatri All castes expect chamars in a region usually are from same aryan tribe and had homogenus DNA back when tribe came abt. Varna system solidifying and literary work being seen as being more pure meant people on lower brackets of same Aryan tribe were more easy on abt with breeding with Moolnivasis. Steppe kang is redudant then So there is nothing special abt castes which came abt being from this social varna division. People of same varna like bhramins of different Aryan tribes don't share same ancestors. Same for kshtriya communities on these regions too This makes yadav(ahir) caste even more compelling cause the caste and its gotras all aren't product of this varna system but direct descendancy from yadu tribe itself I am currently studying Yadav history. I have just started. I would make a YouTube vid abt this too
>>30516 This thread is only abt ahirs not other groups under modern Yadav umbrella
The cope Yadav (Shudra) chamars try to say to feel like they are not Shudra Chamar lmao. Chal, Bhains ka Gobar utha, Hijde.
>>30516 >1) Yadu - Ahirs / yadavs ( aryan tribe in gangetic planes) ? Then why do Thakurs Bench Press and rape Yadav chamara in BIMARU land? This really feels like a bad cope. Probably some fabricated story Yadav (Chamars) tell to themself to feel good. Also it makes even less sense because Ahirs claim to be frok west UP, but that is Jatt region. Gangetic plains will be Bimaru shithole of the Bihari Yadavs. They look shitskin and abbo. That is full of logical fallacies.
>>30516 Abe gaandu yadu were kshatriya aryans. modern bhangis started using Yadav last name last century during british census after mahasabha meetings lmao they have no connection to Yadu tribe.
>>30520 Don't derail this thread Read the picrel I don't want ur hijdapan here I will explain everything in tommorow's thread
>>30523 people usinv yadav last name are not yadavs that is why. Jadaun Rajputs are connected to the Yadu clan.
>>30525 Aur ro lmao, Yadu were Kshatriya, Yadav are Chamars kek
>>30526 That is also a point I'll counter tommorow. A lot of u are deluded I would love to enlighten you It's my sleeping time rn. Later
>>30528 Cry harder pajeet kumar paadav from peehar
>>30526 >Jadaun Rajputs are connected to the Yadu clan. True, Jadaun Rajput are the only real ome who have anything to do with the last one descendant of Yadu that stayed alive after the fratricide. Ahirs are not real Yadu, they were just chamars actually.
>>30524 >they have no connection to Yadu tribe. This, because the argument does not hold under haplogroup either. If we were to go by this logic, then there should have been a core genetic cline among the Ahir (not real Yadav btw, buffalo shit cleaners historically all of them). Instead it is no different from the other group. Further, they dont share haplo with each other either within same Gotra. Its just modern day cope, kind of the same way Dalits kanged at being Kshatriya.

[Post Reply]
[Index] [Catalog] [Top] R: 11 / P: 3 / Connecting

Theme: