>>30124
There is a theory that covers a section of how disproportionately the rich caste like vellalars, marathas, yadavs are all behind breaking the faith and lineage as we know it. Makes sense because these said caste openly commit atrocity against chamars, but they shit on UC for some reason. I find it fascinating. Meanwhile, Rajus and Baniyas dont actuakly hate agragarians, and had an overall good relation with tribals.
Kurmis chamars did the same thing in past tbh, and there was case where they raped non patel women (same caste as them) in public for no reason. It is even more funny how most rejerbhation are done by people of OBC samaj too, paadavs and so on, the goojar, jatts are fine but Dahia also talked about these things, including the german sheepo, chances are most jatts are not a part of this due to agragarian history they have themself, but some are who dont have any loyalty with other jatts.
>>30138
Only dehati rajus ik are subhuman looking as well subbo activities
The urban ones look good
My Verma friend is a femboy looking tall dude very submissive
And one thakur, the only one in my lobby is literal bottom. Posts fag shi on insta
>>30140
Yeah, i never met a raju who was obnoxious or anything. Met few goojars who would be kanging a lot in delhi, untill some theth jatt would rape them in middle of street. Rajus are pretty tame irl, and unless one told you he was specifically a Raju, its pretty hard to tell for most part.
>>30140
>>30143
Strange, all rajus I met were absolute subhuman dehatis. Brahmins truly carry themselves with class hence all castes even ambedkarite SC STs respect them
>>30151
I think people are getting it all other way arround. Its inpossible to confirm who is a ponga and who is a raju on internet. Irl, it is basis for ground reality, and it should be thus treated as benchmark.
>>30155
Retard did not even crop it, lmao, also why do pakifags use "meri, kahegi, karti" like a bunch of faggots. Muzzies from india as well. They seem to be unironically sissy.
