Why does no one ever counter argues with woman when she says "past is past, it doesnt matter"
Many women at the age of marriage say this thing and no one ever counter argues them.
That's a huge flaw in that "past is past" statement.
Your present will become past after some years, like if you get married to that girl in 2026, in 2036 marriage will be a past incident, does it mean that marriage which took place in 2026 is just a past now and it's doesn't mean anything to you
>>252629
1. Don't argue, red flag, just back off, unless very desperate i guess.
2. Normie-jeet is very easy to deceive with logical fallacies and alike. Mudi ji rules for a reason.
3. If I had to argue anyway with a lame ass sensible response it would be something like, "I bet you didn't know this. It does matter dear kumari, what was in the past increasingly doesn't matter as much but it does suggest what kind of a person you are and where your mind tends to be. Something you did as 12 is far less note worthy but as you mature, something sussy in your 18s,20s is an indicator of what kind of a human you are. Courts take into account past crimes during conviction for a reason."
>>252629 (OP) #
It's a convenient way for matters of past to end .
As it hint a statement, if you dwell in past too long your present and future might cliffs. Quite a clever trick every girl had under her arsenal.
>2027-2036.
I don't get it, are you taking about affair? Analogy or something.
If yes then this won't works anymore as now woman is under your protection so ahe is obliged to share this with you. Previous she was under the protection of her father. Your foreign in her World if you di have problem then don't enter in her life.
..........
