>>246935
Ramayan will become like odyssey soon not in impact but its existence will be questioned. No one says odyssey is real but say ramayan is fake jeets will ack you. And i am seeing lot of jhoomers calling it fiction these days. However i dont think its fiction like entirely. But parts about ravan being demigod and ram being god is 100% fake
>>246970
*I meant after Mahabharat
Because evidence suggests that society and kingdoms seem far more sophisticated during the ramayan era than in Mahabharat
>>246975
I dont think it happened. Because mahabharat has many reference to ramayan. Including hanuman being brother of bhim. That has been consistent throughout every mahabharat interpretation
>>246979
Both as texts were compiled later on by a scholars.
Krishna was most likely a diplomat.
Mahabharat refers to an era of iron age. Pandavas and Kauravas represent late Vedic tribes more than they do represent dynasties. Even the rest of states like gandhar etc. Also if you note combat styles, it is way more graphic, and shows more use of primitive weapons than ramanyan does.
