/b/ - Random

ok so ill equip you with the story the story featured in a 365 panchtantra book goes like >there exists a old man, he gonna die pretty soon >he has somethings to in on his inheritance which his sons desperately want on his side >i think what he has is cows some land some brick making factory (bhatta) >he expects his death soon. one day he summons all his sons >he tells them to break a stick. each of them try each of them do >then he breaks that stick and gives them that big stick into 5 piceces bundled up and then tells to break them >all of them try none of them is able to >then the grandpa poses this as when there is one stick or no unity one person its easier to break >and with unity fives stick or family unity is harder to break <end of story now the problem with this is why this came to my mind is becoz i was breaking a stick today. first i broke one wood stick sure easy thing. then i tried to break those two broken halves together, was a bit hard but did it then tried to break those five together and i couldn't. i thought oh it must be cause there are more stick but no i tried breaking one of those smaller pieces and i still couldn't then tried two big sticks together instantly broke <line break this made me realize in the story why the sons failed to break the bundle isn't cause many sticks are the issue but smaller the sticks can be applied less torque on dont matter bigger sticks ,they are so long torque from geometric center is high u easily break them even a single small stick cant be reaken thats why >so whole moral was fraud the reason why they couldnt break the small sticks has nothing to with no of stick <line break yes for tards in here the force need is linearly proportional to no of sticks but the proportionality factor is very small. quantity is redundant. main determining factor is length