[Index] [Catalog] [Bottom] R: 9 / P: 5 / Connecting

File: 1791979679.png (463.6KB, 1224x1294)
Post Image
I remember that one time we had a Chinese anon posting along with us on inch many years ago I wonder how he's doing
>>225622 Kek, drop more lore please >t. 2 years old nufag
>>225675 the OP is not a 2 years old nufag you retard
>>225683 He is the Sindhi khetshitter anon, he is retarded like that. He doesn’t understand what greentext means.
>>225675 you had to be there really, it was a fun exchange he was using VPN or proxies to circumvent the manchurian firewall iirc not even sure if archives from that thread even exists
>>225686 I remember that thread, some of the claims I remember him making >That Xi jinpinfg doesn't have a cult of personality unlike Modi, most people in chinklsnd just see him as a executive who does his job okay but desperately wants to be praised for it >That most in China actually think censorship and firewall was a good thing because of made Chinese independent from American tech giants >Also that many in China who knows about the le forbidden truths line the the tankman student protests don't actually care about them
>>225683 >>225684 I meant I'm a nufag who's been here since the past 2 years. Am I using >t. incorrectly? Am I supposed to use just .t [word] ? >>225686 >>225687 In which year and which inch iteration this happened?
>>225687 it was a long thread, and a memorable one at that in a long while many anons jumped in to talk with him >>225690 its yours truly so applies to (You) when used without a greentext
>>225690 when referring to yourself, use t. but not greentext when referring to the one you are replying to, use both greentext and t.
>>225692 >>225693 thanks for enlightening me

[Post Reply]
[Index] [Catalog] [Top] R: 9 / P: 5 / Connecting

Theme: