>>224534
J. D. Unwin's 1934 thesis is widely rejected by modern historians, anthropologists, and sociologists because it relies on outdated 19th-century theories of "social evolutionism" that are no longer considered scientifically valid. His core claim—that sexual restraint directly generates a mystical "civilizational energy"—mistakes correlation for causation and completely ignores the complex economic, technological, geographic, and political factors that actually drive the rise and fall of societies. Furthermore, his rigid timeline of automatic societal collapse within "three generations" is treated by scholars as a pseudoscientific myth rather than a historical law. Real-world data directly contradicts his premise, as long-term societal prosperity, stability, and innovation heavily correlate with increased gender equality and women's legal rights.
>>224541
I use ai to generally fact check, i just dont wanna argue with you ,as i thought this is you avg bait. We can have our discussion now if you want.
>>224539
A poor side effectc of AI for every thought verification is this exactly, you wil be fed answers made acknowledged by mass media
Mass media will never accept micro chimerism
>>224565
you think saraswati would advocate for your daughter to get a sugar daddy while she is 19 and the sugar daddy is 35?
Women have no sexual morality.
Majority of men dont have it too, but they still follow rules if high value men establish them, now high value men themselves are gone and high status men cum and dump
women will fuck the sexual harmony of society, no doubt,
you should ask AI for more cope
>>224568
>saraswati would advocate
This will never happen in first place as i would give her proper guidance. And no goodness is accountable for your own actions. We pray for god and godess for our own sake, they don't need us we need them.
>Women have no sexual morality
That's a very bold statement, why you think so, everyone has the right to explore their your sense pleasing activities. We can't thot police them forever. Instead teach them what need to be taught at the right time and let them flow. Otherwise you becomes their enemy.
>women will fuck the sexual harmony of society, no doubt
Another bolde statement, without concept evidence, man can fk the society the same way as woman. I do believe a bad mother is far worth then a bad father (my personal opinion)
>>224539
>Real-world data directly contradicts his premise, as long-term societal prosperity, stability, and innovation heavily correlate with increased gender equality and women's legal rights.
This is untrue though. Women's liberation do have benefits in a single generation, as what would happen when you double the labour force over night.
However after a single or two generation, the compounding effects of a increased labour competition, decreasing fertility rates, decreasing relationship formation (due to a variety of issues related to women joining the work force, which is too descriptive to go in here), increased property prices(This is the direct result of increased labour and decreased family formation) eventually getting rid of any of it's benefits.
What data does AI even has to argue this? We have only reached the second generation of feminism, what data does AI have to claim its net positive long term? In India, maybe the first generation have only started. The third generation maybe starting in the west and already there's lots of issues rising you can't just ignore, the dependency ratio is fucked there and the cascading effects is forcing their governments to import more immigrants despite immigration being a widely unpopular issue.
>>224579
I aggre with you on this, womans in labour sector eventually decrees fertility over time if not checked properly. Bit i think this only happens in highly compititive market like usa or japan or korea. Can't say the same for country like india. Where family is as equals sometimes more important then money you generate.
>>224573
>This will never happen
That's a bold assertion dude.
>We can't thot police them forever
Agree, civilisational cycles are inevitable. Eventually people will ask why the rigid traditions existed were placed and then destroy them and by the time people understand why they exist, it'll be too late.
>my personal opinion
Your personal opinion matter zilch. The research is out there. Single mothers usually raise more dysfunctional children, even more than single fathers and even gay fathers(who are the least dysfunctional). And you know who have even more dysfunctional families? Lesbian couples.
>>224582
>Bit i think this only happens in highly compititive market like usa or japan or korea.
Nigga, what do you even define as 'competitive' market 😭😭😭
Half the South American countries have a fertility rate lower than Japan.
And America(The US of A) has a fertility rate higher than South, West and North india.
Its only East India that has an unusually high birth rate.
>>224594
You can just jewgle this my nigga. I also suggest following this couple's channel. They were unapologetic magafags but their videos on fertility, AI and economics is very interesting.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0GL00pZEkK8https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=0GL00pZEkK8
