If rajputs are kangz how come they have such large population. They are 5 to 10% (that would mean 1 in 20 is a raju)? Also how come most of them are bhillagers? Aren't kangz supposed to be in cities?
>>202485
Baniya just means trader. Its only rajus whose label literally means 'son of king'. Its height of kanging. Yeah i get every pajeet jaat has some kang story but rajus have peak kanging. Entire identity is kanging.
>>202510
Well all of us including some chamar will have some kang in our line if we go back far enough. Doesnt mean much when 99% of your ancestors are peasants.
>>202549
I never said 10% of entire india, duh. Rajus are not in south india. But in BIMARU belt they are easily 5 to 10%.
>ofc they will have high population in their origin land.
Rajus dont have some origin land retard. Its a meme label. If anything their highest %age is in Himachal and uttarakhand.
>>202557
26% of the population is rajput. Good number of other aryan triber there too.
Random poor town in desert is cleaner than rest of pajeetia because of no subhuman pasmandas n chamars.
If not for mullas and chamars there, it would be much much better.
Its the same memery as how more syeds are found in pajeet subcontinent than arabia. Titles like rajput, syed are result of sociocultural adoption not migration.
>>202564
Rajus from bihar or pahads trace their origin to rajasthan.
>But in BIMARU belt they are easily 5 to 10%.
false. bihar caste census shows their population to b 3%.
Only in pahads they are more than 10% of the population.
>>202582
>Rajus from bihar or pahads trace their origin to rajasthan.
Same as mujeet syeds trace their origin from arabia, pajeet. No evidence whatsoever and y haplo analysis bunks it. Seems like you dont get it. Its a meme label with kang stories adopted over centuries.
>>202478
rajput is made up caste in 11th centruy
after collapse of gupta empire there failed to be a major power ruling in lundia unlike before
no one could consolidate much power and area. so all these small principalities of different leaniages, small kings and zamindars came in distress that under such circumstance and no single governing body they be weak and easily overtaken
so different zamindars and other people from rciher class of different castes be ahirs (yadavs), jaats or b tribals such as gonds bhils or variety consolidated under one suffix rajuput meaning rulers
and these different groups then started intermarrying each other to act as one big political entity. it was a caste made of different races/ castes with sole purpose to protect their wealth and power in a fragmented india with no power hegemony
>>202655
a great example a social group can be made under any intial condition. rajputs exist cause of capitalism.
bishnohi what is considerd a caste group today wasnt even genetically related until 1th century
The sect was established by Guru Jambheshwar (also known as Jambhoji) after he witnessed severe ecological devastation and a prolonged drought in the desert. people who followed the sect became them
