Enemies of india r not punjabis, pakis, kashmiris or ne ppl
Foes of the bharata are subhumans, those whom indra invaded and humiliated
Example- mallus, tamils, kanglus, dalits and brahmins
brahmins and dalits both need genocide because this is a shudra(indian bharata) nation and these both ppl exploit us and steal our money
The Aryan race was a Martial race, the temple tradition and idol worshipping are dasyu traditions, Aryans worshipped Cosmic order(rta) and Natural forces like skies, thunder and agnī
>>20063
>>20064
you niggas are the enemy of pajeetia for rotting here and doing nothing to nation building. pajeets like you are the reason why papers get leaked and shit. how about you kill yourself and do other people a favour?
>>20073
Turkey is muzzie majority and it's still better than pajeetia. Literally any country is better than pajeetia. Pajeets always need a reason to blame something.
>>20076
Turkey is muslim? On paper yes, but majority are just non practicing they care more about the turkish identity and nation over muslim ummah and chumah.
No pajeet muslim care about lundia or national identity they have no loyality to this nation.
>>20050
If your main definition is enemies of Indra, then Iranians are the arch enemies of Indians (called anindras in the Rig Veda).
In the Zoroastrian Vendidad (an anti-demonic text), Indar is explicitly listed as one of the chief arch-demons (daevas) subordinate to Angra Mainyu (the spirit of ultimate evil).
>>20096
>AI explanation
The early Vedic Indo-Aryans and the ancient Iranians (whose religion later became Zoroastrianism) actually started from a very similar cultural and linguistic background. They likely descended from a common Indo-Iranian tradition before splitting into separate groups.
The "beef" came later as their religions evolved in different directions.
1. They shared common roots
Many important religious concepts have cognates:
Vedic Iranian/Zoroastrian
Sanskrit Avestan
Mitra Mithra
Yajna Yasna
Soma Haoma
Asura Ahura
This shows they were once closely related cultures.
2. The Deva–Ahura reversal
The biggest disagreement was over which gods were good.
In the Vedic tradition:
Devas were the gods (Indra, Agni, Varuna, etc.).
Asuras gradually became associated with enemies or demons.
In Zoroastrianism:
Ahura ("Asura" cognate) became the holy divine beings.
Daevas ("Devas" cognate) became false gods or demons.
This is one of the most famous religious reversals in history.
3. Indra became a villain
In the Vedas, Indra is the king of the gods and a hero who defeats demons.
In the Zoroastrian scriptures, a figure corresponding to Indra appears among the demonic powers opposed to truth.
That suggests the two traditions had already split and were polemicizing against each other's religious practices.
4. Possible tribal conflicts
Some historians think there may have been political and tribal rivalries among early Indo-Iranian groups.
The Vedic texts describe conflicts with figures such as Sambara and other non-Vedic groups. Meanwhile, Iranian traditions developed their own religious reforms.
However, we don't have evidence for one giant "Vedic vs. Zoroastrian war." The conflict was mostly ideological and religious.
5. Zoroaster's reforms
Zarathustra (Zoroaster) criticized practices that seem similar to those of older Indo-Iranian religions, including the worship of the daevas.
His movement emphasized:
Truth (Asha)
Ethical choice
Worship of Ahura Mazda
This created a sharper distinction from the Vedic tradition.
Ironically...
The Vedic and Zoroastrian religions are more like cousins who had a family feud than complete opposites. They share language, rituals, sacred fire, priestly traditions, and many ancient concepts. Their disagreement became famous because each side ended up demonizing some of the divine beings revered by the other.
