Why closer to equator you get, the more subhuman looking people get? Is it due to climate or just lack of sexual selection?
>inb4 white skin is more visible.
This seems like ad hoc rationalisation. Why would brightness even matter for attractiveness? The root cause remains unanswered.
>>199290
yaar jeet tujhe gori chamdi lekar skin cancer chahiye kya, it's natural selection if we leave australian bhaite saar without any tech on australia after some thousand years they'd start looking like aborginals
>>199294
No they won't. At best they would be brown with caucasoid skull. Race once evolved does not easily devolve. Why do indonesians look different from congolese blacks despite both being on equator? Think nigga.
>>199297
yaar jeet evolution doesn't have any goal
give it thousands or millions of year it can convert a dog into flying predator or whatever maybe extinction
same with islanders
even the onge tribe was once thought to be closest relative of aasi abbos isn't the depiction of aasi phenotype because in just 30 years they have gone under insular dwarfism and tons of island based adaptions.
australia is already separated. and it's not that white saaar doesn't have dark skin genes it's just that their frequency in gene pool is very less
give it some time and watch white saar becoming abbo
>>199298
>give it some time and watch white saar becoming abbo
but humans are evolved enough to create boats and rafts and tons of medical and other interventions has caused diverted or halted natural selection
the child which were supposed die with genes containing autism and shi are now in the gene pool
it iz aaabhar
>>199298
Thats not how evolution works nigga. Sri Lankans and Tamils dont look like subsaharans are more intelligent than niggers despite being on same latitude and in same climate as niggers for 1000s of years. Thats because they have been through more evolutionary steps than nigger apes (for eg, genetic bottleneck into small tribe of high iq neotenous evolved migrants out of africa through sahara).
>>199310
>it's not much time that they have spent in sri lunka.
What? They have been in sri lanka for 50,000 years and have built kingdoms and trade much before tech. Modern tech is just 200 years old.
>>199310
You dont understand how evolution works. Once evolved things dont easily devolve. Humans outside africa have been through bottlenecks and selection pressures (it was a small tribe that left africa and crossed sahara, we all are their descendants).
>>199315
For example whales and dolphins evolved from land mammals that returned to sea. They evolved to live in water but they did not magically become fish. They are still mammals that give live births instead of laying eggs and breathe through lungs instead of gills.
>>199332
Thats just a colloquial way of saying evolution isn't easily 'undone'. Humans are not going to evolve back into protozoa because we have accumulated too many evolutionary changes. Evolution is not some magical thing.
>>199330
Pheno has changed to an extent that allows them to swim but dolphins and whales have mammalian features. Pheno can only change so much. White aussies are not gonna magically change into aussie abbos. At best they would look like brown indians with caucasoid skulls. Whites have been through more evolution than aussie abbos and evolution isnt easily undone.
