>>19375
Yadav are not descendant of Krishna tho, that would be Jadau Rajput. Yadavs are just feces cleaners who took Yadav title, same thing some other castes in south did as well.
>>19414
There are no known descendants of any god or legendary kings. These are just fancy myths of origin people used to come up with back in the day.
>>19414
That's just high time baman mughal chut cope
It was goalas of bihar who took up the surname yadav during sanskritzation (bihar has ahirs too) . Ahirs found in UP haryana Rajasthan etc are actually the original yadavs, may u believe it or not. Mentions of rajputs and ahirs are done separately in mahabharat
It's only instbhangis who's information rely on goyslop they consume and lack shallow believe these perpetuated lies
I could show u n evidences and bunk n evidences.
U like to imagine krishan ji as some warrior yielding sword n shield, born learning to fight. NO. He was always pastoralist. Yadavs or abhira are a tribe that originated in the north west. They were never part of ur varna system. High steppe but not part of varna system. There's a reason duryodhan mocks Krishan ji as cow herder and krishna was also dark skinned (so was arjun) if ur ahh was envisioning a blued eyes warrior
Let's say u still don't believe my word when ahirs village village in haryana refers krishan as dada krishan centuries prior to sanskritzation, Then krishnaut yadavs would be direct contender for direct leniage
>>19478
That is what i said as well, Yadav and Chamar are technically same groups. Its just Yadavs hate how they will never be Rajus. I could call Alexander, Dada Alex, but that wont make me Macadonian kek.
>>19426
No that's a lie
Aandu pandu scholars have a simple argument against yadavs that if the cursed ended the whole leniage how do yadavs even exist. Well simply the whole leniage didn't even end
Vajranabha survived, his great grandson
>>19426
Not really, i can see if some people got absorbed the same way Maratha had their Kshatriyasisation. However Yadav is not a real caste. It was a bunch of Buffalo shit cleaners who started calling themself the descendant of Krishna. They all themself are distinct castes and hate each other, kek.
>>19479
Nah u can just keep coping
Still look for a ethnicity though which is trying to be raju
Having been around rajus in my campus tells me enough expect the few royals in courts u Kang on majority are low born larpers
I had some rajasthani yadav friends and they came under general category also they were fair skinned and tall, and meanwhile avg bihari yadav I see running rickshaws and supplying water cans is dysgenic
>>19491
So the only good looking Yadav woman in existence is not even a Yadav? Damn, i feel sorry about these guys. Their own women are so hideous they have to marry better looking ones from higher caste.
>>19482
>leniage
Yeah we could tell you are a paadav, that aside, Vajranabha is where Jadau Rajput come on in. Gowala, and other castes that come under "Yadav" umbrella is sort of an attempt to rise and legitimise themself, in which they failed. The irony of this entire argument is, there are also fair skinned (depending on region) and tall dalits who have better martial and moral disposition than Yadavs, and other wanna be divine or royal lineage. Why would we specifically be treating yadav better, when Paswan or Chamars could and should get same kind of treatment as them.
>>19489
Looks into ur bhangi claims
royal leniage where masses of people deem a person to be krishan vansaj
Nandvanshis
Yadav king of Puri
Also deemed first servitor of lord jannagnath
Literally Ahir
High time to rope shit flinging raju
>>19496
>lookikg
Please learn to type, also entite AASI vs IVC nignoggery was resolved ages ago. It is not even a real Genotype. You can have lot of Zagros and still look subhuman, it is all about what kind of people came from either group.
>>19499
Bhangi claim
Vajranabha was jadau rajput
Teri ma paida karke gyi thi bhangi ye claim? He was of Kshatriya desecandant. Kshatriya impies martial race, yadavs particularly ahirs always have been. Again ahirs are a tribal group and weren't part of ur varna system. If Krishan ji was randpoot to mention to dikha
Low born I can show u million place in mahabharat where they are mentioned as Ahir u can't show one raju
Saar Tall and fair yadavs are also dalits saar which kalu abbo is projecting this?
>>19504
Calling ignorant bhangi bhangi
Bhangi acts surprised
Ur a low born
Nigga literally calls tall and fair yadavs as just talll and fair dalits
Good cope dalit, keep projecting twink kalwe
>>19509
>Krishan ji was randpoot
Yaar chamar jisko baap banate hai, uski bhi maa nahi jane dete. Life was good when the Rajus used to make you clean buffalo feces tbh.
>>19516
What is ur caste? U can shit fling endlessly with Ur false claims
>good time when we xyz made goalas do gola things
Yeah shudra only a AASI bhangi who's a twink would deem tall and fair yadavs as tall and fair dalits cause u know ur low born is ass in wrong. U can just hide behind ur varna when ur a dalit deep down
>Krishan ji was randpoot not a yadav
Yeah I can show u another million proofs directly from mahabharat text tu bas bhokta rhe
>>19522
>Shudra calling others Shudra
KEKKK, you guys dont even hate other castes, you hate what you are, oppress and bench press those who are same as you, and think it somehow makes you even a little better kek.
