Why do people take their lies of 'hindus also persecuted buddhists saar' seriously?
There is no evidence whatsoever.
>inb4 shunga, shashanka
Based on uncorroborated biased and non contemporary buddhist sources. Archaeology disproves it.
>inb4 kshemagupta, nara I of kashmir.
Kshemagupta burnt a vihara because a local rebel took refuge in it. Nara I burnt viharas because a monk eloped with his wife. No instance of religious motivation.
>>193524
For communist revolution to occur, the most powerful unifying factor ( in case of india hinduism) has to be weakened
So they will continue to do so until revolution occurs or you annihilate the commies
Mulla just do this to portray them and us being same
>>193524
If I had to tell you my first hand experience with mullas then it would be that they keep repeating same lies again and again so much so that they themselves start believing in what lies they told you were not lies but truth.
They are shameless in this manner they don't have honour of their own
Demolish a masjid a temple will occur.
demolish a Temple a monastery will occur.
Why is it so hard to agree the rich don't care about god's like us plebs.
They use it for their benefits and nothing more.
And us plebs wil fight for that kek
