>>193005
Actually no current political side has any aesthetic. But if you did this thing it would be:
1)"communism": richfag chadjeet staceyjeet
2)Capitalism: fatass jain ugly nigger
3)Fascism: Rapey bimaru pajeet labourer 5'0 in hieght.
>>193000
This image is retarded. Actual communists cunts were very trad. You're not going to be in to woke nignoggery when you're fuckin starving kek.
First is more late stage capitalism aka woke capitalism and second is more early onset capitalism.
>>193011
>richfag chadjeet staceyjeet
Most of them vote for beejaypee.
>Rapey bimaru pajeet labourer 5'0 in hieght
And most of them vote for leftist parties.
>>193017
>>193019
Samefagging aside, it's been almost a century women's right and there's nothing notable women achieved that wasn't in the shadow of a man, in fact ruined it whenever they were voted in to power kek. Not to mention more unhappy, depressed and medicated than ever before. Maybe it's better if they had stayed like it?
>>193022
>>richfag chadjeet staceyjeet>Most of them vote for beejaypee.>>Rapey bimaru pajeet labourer 5'0 in hieght>And most of them vote for leftist parties.
That's cope. I've seen many bimaru labourers with the saffron scarf.
>>193022
>Most of them vote for beejaypee.
Why did cjp take off in so many college campuses then? If your in any college, you'll know that all of them were reposting CJP when it habbened
>>193019
Also fascism isn't 'conservative' kek. They were vehemently opposed to conservativism. The countries that fought the Nazis were 1940s US, UK and USSR which was more conservative than Weimar Germany was kek.
>>193022
you dont have to be achieving to be valued and have basic rights if that were so useless scums like you would be banished from society before a single woman does
i could even actually got to the point and tell you what women have achieved but all that for a stubborn person is a little too much to do
>Not to mention more unhappy, depressed and medicated than ever before
just result of urbanization. majority nations are still under men yet testosterone levels are lower than ever, men suffering more than ever
>>193028
if women are unhappy theyll be willing trying to revert things back
a man doesnt have to decide for them and be the torch bearer as to what they feel what they dont
>>193025
>>193026
I'm not arguing based on 'vibes' or anecdotes. The stats are out there negro.
This is just another retarded myth like in 2010s that minorities in US vote conservative and whites vote liberal.
>>193027
whole idea of fascism is identity based discrimination with "trust me bro" benchmarks and no democratic principles
sure if u consider all group of terrorists as inferior its okay but its only ever minority groups or women
>>193032
>>193033
ye le bhangi, now don't change goalpost by saying this is for MH not for UP or dalli. dalli's same too. more educated and forward mobile vote bjp
>>193028
>you dont have to be achieving to be valued
No, but you should at the very least not be a destabilising force for the system, and make it worse for everyone else which is the minimum most men are capable of doing unlike women.
>what women have achieved
Women have achieved nothing else other than turn the entire society a self validating self defeating long house filled with solipsistic vain women and effeminate men but sure, just be deluded women did many great things lmao.
>just result of urbanization
There's nothing more urban than suburbia.
>men suffering more than ever
Who told you this lmao? Some YouTube channel? By all markers of prosper ity they're much better of than men.
Even the so called 'loneliness epidemic' is found to affect women worse than men.
>>193030
>if women are unhappy theyll be willing trying to revert things back
No they won't, if they had that much self awareness, they wouldn't be where they're now.
Fortunately feminist mind virus is a self culling force and history will be grateful people like you voluntarily removed yourself from the gene pool.
>>193034
Fascism was hardly an 'identity' based discrimination. You might be confusing Nazism with fascism. Fascism was primarily concerned with the primacy of state.
>trust me bro benchmarks
It's undeniable fact of history that Nazis saved the German economy, to this day Nazi Germany was the only country that overcome US GDP in the last 100 years.
>no democratic principles
Again untrue lol. All fascists parties and their offshoots like the nazi parties won majorities in their respective nations.
You know which party actually lost elections and then threw a hissy fit and then banned voting? The bolsheviks.
>>193051
Of course, when you search about it, it's all cope and malding by "academics" who will be doing 'umm ackshually' all over the place why something that looks like working is actually le bad kek.
>>193050
all of you tards can keep fear mongering
>women bad
is all u have for a argument. when i ask why
>cause women low iq, cause women too emotinal, women 0 self awarness
chauvinism
>>193051
>>trust me bro benchmarks>It's undeniable fact of history that Nazis saved the German economy, to this day Nazi Germany was the only country that overcome US GDP in the last 100 years.
This is not true, they were extremely banktrupt and in debt, look at mefo bills.
>>193054
fear mongering is also one way u goyims are controlled the most
>just hate "xyz" cause if u dont theyll kill us all>just follow god cause if u question him youll got to hell that nor have u or i have seen
u r one of those set of normfags who fall for all this
>>193056
Women are just men with tits. they are not that bad when you get to know them. They are more normie on average but thats it. They are as evil or as good as the average man.
>>193054
I've presented the arguments already. But all you do is seethe like a monke and call people low IQ kek.
>>193055
>they were extremely banktrupt and in debt
Yeah, why would that be?
>>193056
Again selffagging aside.
I neither believe in gawd nor I fear muzzies nor wahmen lol. This isn't reddit chamar, stop talking like you're talking to a choir.
>>193051
> nazi parties won majorities in their respective nations.
to conflate majoritarianism with democratic principles is another sign both u tards lack any critical thinking
if this were so in a nation of 70% muslims 30% christinas lebanon muslim electing government would imply discrimante all christians
democracy does not mean majoritarianism
>>193056
partition never happened
direct action day never happened
right, libchakka bros?
reasoning doesn't go through brains of libchakkas only a bullet or a knife on throat can save him.
>>193062
Demo means people and cracy means rule. Democracy literally means rule of the people.
To put things to perspective, Switzerland has an actual direct democracy and highest rated in democracy indices and they didn't gave women's suffrage until the 90s.
Sure but go on and twist the meaning of democracy means.
>if this were so in a nation of 70% muslims 30% christinas
In an actual democracy these two would be different nations.
>>193076
Is that your argument? Google it just because? Alright then buddy, try googling difference between republicanism and actual democracy and what we actually are in.
>>193076
talking to dumb people is like talking to a wall. i usually exit debates with stupif people when i know theres enough content ive written that even u infer my above messages and be willing to understand u do will
>>193051
This is how I know u r larping the nazi got only around 30ish percent of seats they never had the majority.
The corporate lobby pushed for hitler to be a chancellor read ur history nigger.
How much larp will u do
I was skeptical of you by your above points but I was hesitant because either u were ignorant and i don't want you to lose ur debate spirit or u r malicious.
Either way your whole basis is wrong ask me anything and I'll crush ur basis one by one.
>>193089
>This is how I know u r larping the nazi got only around 30ish percent of seats
Did you know Weimar republic was a multi party democracy?
>The corporate lobby pushed for hitler
They did not. Its communist myth lmao. Most corporate lobbies opposed hitler and supported his opponent(I forgot his name).
This myth is based on support from few actual nazi sympathizing businessmen like Ford. That's like saying corporate pushed Marxism because Engels funded Marx.
>>193104
Of course after that gained power, all businesses toed the line like how every fucking business did everywhere in the world (like how Facebook went from super woke during height of blm to pro free speech after Trump won). That's what corporates do.
Nevermind
anyways back to debunking to ur points
U overcorrected my stance.
In November 1932 Hitler wasn't directly elected Chancellor; Hindenburg appointed him after President and other conservative elites negotiated his appointment.
The German historical museum states that leading busines were definitely behind Hitler rise to power.
Like how modi doesn't need every industrialist just ambani and adani conglomerate.
Or how the keibatsu of Japan support the ruling party it was enough that small and medium enterprises were not consulted.
The 44% is after the hitler used his political power to reduce the communist and bunch of illegal tactics which the modern political scientist debates that should not be considered as the people's mandate.
If anything this thread just shows how retarded most librandus are. Like the retard who actually believes that richfags support communism to the retard who don't even know the difference between a democracy and a republic and the retard who actually believes bolshevik myths(who actually lost elections btw oh and Lenin was actually sent to Russia to destabilise it by German elites).
>>193114
U r aware then most of right wing but that's it.
U purposefully or decietfully hide certain parts of the truth.
That does not make u smart just a bad faith debater.
>>193112
>Hindenburg appointed him after President and other conservative elites negotiated his appointment
So your argument is that Nazis only won 30% of the seats and the other major party is another one who was mildly sympathetic to the nazi cause and eventually got subsumed by it?
Kek. Whatever lol.
Anyways what about Mussolini who actually did have popular support?
>The 44% is after the hitler used his political power to reduce the communist and bunch of illegal tactics
Yeah sure buddy. They definitely would've won otherwise lmao.
Question for you. Between had BJP disappeared, who would average bjp nigger vote for. Hindu mahasabha or congress?
>>193112
>The German historical museum states that leading busines were definitely behind Hitler rise to power.
Where does it say that? I can't find any source on it.
are you once again hallucinating based on bolshevik sources?
>>193116
>>193118
>U purposefully or decietfully hide certain parts of the truth.
Like not repeating bolshevik spread myths without ever checking it ad nauseum?
>>193120
My argument is the hitler did not have the people's mandate
>Anyways what about Mussolini who actually did have popular support
Whataboutery
>had BJP disappeared, who would average bjp nigger vote for. Hindu mahasabha or congress?
U seem to have selective amnesia the reason bjp won in 2014 was because of economic reasons the bjp at the time did not impose themselves as Hindu rakhsha or something like that.
The niggers are a small minority my guess around 15% which is not enough to change the scales. it was the centrists who had the power to vote BJP in. As you can see the bjp too has sub 40% vote share.
The electoral first past the post system is fundamentally flawed. It does not represent citizens true representatives.
>>193116
>U r aware then most of right wing but that's it.
I wouldn't even librandus who are in here aware
Your kind have done nothing other than repeat self propogated factoids as truth and expected people to just take it like you do in your echo chambers.
That's why you get the retard like above who actually thinks villagejeets vote for bjp and urban jeets for congi kek.
Anyways I'm feeling sleepy I'll check in in the morning and bolsheviks sources are also true if not they would not have been cited so many times in multiple studies. On either side of spectrum.
>>193125
I never said that village or urban bjp has a strong grassroots system but even then truly loyal of them do not constitute more than 15% the "andhbhakts" if u don't understand. remaining rest of the vote share are not loyal as you think.
>>193124
>My argument is the hitler did not have the people's mandate
He had the highest plurality of support.
>Whataboutery
That's not how whataboutery means lol. Especially when my original post was talking about fascists in general and it was you who chose to hyper focus on the actual popularity of Hitler.
>the reason bjp won in 2014 was because of economic reasons
The main reason for BJP's rise was the Ram Janmabhoomi movement.
>The electoral first past the post system is fundamentally flawed. It does not represent citizens true representatives
Oh, then can we talk about actual direct democracies then. Which tend to be even more conservative than 'fascist' democracies?
>bolsheviks sources are also true if not they would not have been cited so many times in multiple studies
Who says this except the bolsheviks lmao. Once again you just hallucinated the entire German history museum claim and chose to ignore it.
Here's an even more thorough debunking of the myth that Hitler was funded by the capitalists
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fNvfzJwyzX8https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fNvfzJwyzX8
I know there is no point in trying to convince the commie chamars who actually believe this myth but it's for the rest of the others who wants to be educated when librandu repeats ad nauseum factoids from their echo chambers they never bothered to check kek
>>193127
>I never said that village or urban bjp has a strong grassroots system
I was not talking about you but the yellow id chamar above you. And you know how retards like him come to believe it?
>>193145
Not really kek, there's no evidence of Goebbels saying it. Once again, it's another one of those factoids, probably again started by the bolsheviks.
