>>191472
Feminist andcommie try so hard to make it feel that niqab and ghunghat are same and are present in equal proportions
Same way they try to equate and random mulla being killed same as al qaeda , taliban etc
>>191472
>Ghunghat
Very few areas of RJ and HR have this practice that too for married women under 40. These librandus need false equivalence to be secular ke chode, so they bring it again and again in response to Hijab debate, when hijab,niqab is mandatory for all muslims girls regardless of age, martial status or place
>>191565
Makes sense
When i was nanha i used to believe that it was real practice in many parts of country and they force women to wear ghunghat. Thinking about it, i never, i say never ever say women wearing ghunghat in real life.
Crazy propaganda
>>191472
Its practical in all villages. Atleast of north. Women took viel infront of sasur, jaith and older in relations mens and village neighbors. But its not that extreme as that chutiya movie lapata ladies where women get married and get photos in ghoonghat. Absolute retardism it was. Randi just copied that iranian movie without a thought and got praise for it too
>>191570
Yaar chutiye anon, I'm talking about what their religion says not how some randi behaves. Cover your own gobar women first.
>>191587
Exactly right, just see who was the producer and maker of that movie
