>>181713
this again?
IVC was an abbo-civilisation.
paki-chamar don't have an ilk of semblance or heritage tied to it. they're just squatting on that land.
>>181713
Pajeets/abbos might be subhuman, but Steppe didn't conquer shit.
Aryan DNA came to India through Aryan women. Sexy Aryan women were lingammed by Zagros and Abbos.
>>181717
Lmfao
The closest descendants of IVC are the people living in the same areas where IVC stood. Stop coping faggot.
>IVC was abbo civilization
Fucking kek. It was 76% Zagros and 24% abbo only.
>>181713
Timmies try to prove existence of sintashta chariots by analyzing literal skid marks while there's an actual chariot found in Sinauli with copper weapons.
>>181727
you're a nit-wit retard.
iranian neolithic farmers weren't aryan at all kek.
pakis are just shitting up prime abbo land right now, claiming that we wuzz kangz n shit, unironically.
>>181725
it is chronologically of a later date, you fucking retard. what you're saying is completely asynchronous.
this is actually a paki/ameritard fan-fic meme.
>>181732
>>The closest descendants of IVC are the people living in the same areas where IVC stood
please give some evidence for this varna tera sarey aam sariya hoga.
>>181734
they aren't. the closest living descendants per genetic makeup of IVC inhabitants live near the foothills of the nilgiris (in southern india) kek. this is a fact.
>>181735
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6288199/https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6288199/>Study of northwest Indian populations found considerable genetic continuity in the region, while also finding substantial later Steppe-related ancestry.>it is chronologically of a later date, you fucking retard. what you're saying is completely asynchronous.
Are you fucking retarded? That's like saying current Australia is downstream from Aboriginals living there kek. You abbos are good for nothing. Kys. Not going to argue any further with you.
>>181749
>Study of northwest Indian populations found considerable genetic continuity in the region, while also finding substantial later Steppe-related ancestry.>substantial later Steppe-related ancestry decries retard's own premise.>genetic-continuity is closest descendants.
you're a mouth-breathing faggot who's way out of his turn and intellect to debate this.
>That's like saying current Australia is downstream from Aboriginals living there kek. You abbos are good for nothing. Kys. Not going to argue any further with you.
chutiye seth lodu, the central vedic pantheon is a post-IVC conception. specifically, the vedic pantheon didn't exist until IVC contributed pashupathinath or shiva to it.
all dating records and sigillography proves it. there was no muh vedic civilisation prior to the intermingling of the zogros and the steppe with the IVC. it is categorically downstream.
>>181780
>pasmanda
anon, your heart is in the right place but you got the whole story upside down.
pakis are trying to say that they built IVC. it is anything but the truth. literal chamars have a great stake or claim to the IVC than any of these muzz-bhangis.
>>181795
Why even kang over IVC? Never understood why jeets do this for izzatmaxxing reasons. There is no rosetta stone structure. We will never know their script. It has no history and no significance.
The story of the subcontinent begins from Vedas. We know that an elite warrior class existed but even the evidence is from post IVC migration period.
>>181802
>jeets
it's a new porki thing to do since they've lost all hope from their lives and this is their latest cope to izzatmaxx in front of others.
>We will never know their script. It has no history and no significance.
part (majority) of the script has already been deciphered. in due time, the other part will get deciphered too.
