>>174356
Unironically a good thing.
>Why?
Because a lot of women are chad-only. Even if they marry a betabuxxer, they'll never be happy with them. They'll always disrespect him, have zero chemistry (dead bedrooms), and only consume his resources. His ability to provide is the whole reason she is tolerating his existence. Shit might get even worse when divorce strikes.
What is even the point of such a relationship? That sub5 guy is better off alone.
As foids get more independent, they won't even need men. They can't have chads so they'll live alone rather than with a sub5.