[Index] [Catalog] [Bottom] R: 32 / P: 9 / Connecting

File: RDT_20260618_15021789635284248(...) (121.9KB, 1526x991)
Post Image
>OBCs of Punjab (Saina , Tarkhan etc) score more steppe genes then uc of up , rajasthan, himachal , uttrakhand. >Jats have highest steppe among all along with saka tribes like kamboj , ror etc. >Rajasthan Gujjars are most zagros type race in India >Brahmins are more steppe then Rajputs generally. >Rajputs have highest AASI among ucs
File: RDT_20260618_15013085753238295(...) (60.0KB, 1416x474)
Post Image
File: RDT_20260618_15025021039304686(...) (116.1KB, 1132x902)
Post Image
File: RDT_20260618_15025644615365540(...) (112.8KB, 1862x872)
Post Image
>>17105 >>17103 How is genetic component calculated in different subcastes
>>17112 No Idea about that but you can look more into this , harappa world , ged match.
Feels like retarded made up shit kek. What was the source whats the sample size?
perfectly matches the state of these castes in the modern day
>>17142 How is this retarded this make sense
>>17142 https://old.reddit.com/r/ABCDesis/comments/odgo9z/northern_central_ne_indian_gedmatch_harappaworld/https://old.reddit.com/r/ABCDesis/comments/odgo9z/northern_central_ne_indian_gedmatch_harappaworld/
>>17147 >reddit >ABCDesis Yeah this is bs
>>17149 Caste and state please
>>17102 >>Rajputs have highest AASI among ucs Baniyas?
>>17102 Very old info for archaeogenetics enthusiasts. I remember seeing these tables 4 years ago. Its common knowledge among south asian ancestry enthusiasts.
>>17151 Up baman
>>17102 >>OBCs of Punjab (Saina , Tarkhan etc) score more steppe genes then uc of up , rajasthan, himachal , uttrakhand. UP/Bihari/Rajasthani brahmins (Gaur, Kanyakubja, Saryuparin, Bhumihar) score high steppe %.
>>17158 We got himachali lund in north after tamil lund in south.
>>17142 Its based on multiple studies like Narsimhan et al, David reich and Shinde et al. Other sources are NRIs taking ancestry tests and uploading their results on Gedmatch to get breakdown.
>>17160 Punjabis are pakistani UP are gangoos
>>17160 Gamgetic bamans generally have the highest steppe admixture for some reason
File: fc137b1534d9f16acd85edf4075a53(...) (18.7KB, 428x368)
Post Image
>>17164 >some reason
>>17164 Not highest. Jaats and Rors have highest, after that it's gangu bamans along with rj/hr bamans.
>>17168 Yeah i meant among UCs
You people don't consider baniyas and jaats as UC?
>>17175 Steppe is a joke man that kanglu muslim who used to spam turkish niggers assraping hondus was right all along. Sorry kanglu bro i was harsh on you please cum back and raoe these hondus show em thier place.
>>17175 Jaats are considered OBCs right ? Idk about aggarwals Hell brahmins even have hierarchical subcastes, lots of bs honestly
>>17164 Gangetic brahmins also have higher aasi and lower zagros than pakis and NW indians. The general trend is higher zagros the more west you go. Even kashmiris have higher aasi than punjabis. Zagros is low in gangetic plains. Even south indian landlord castes have higher zagros than gangetics.
>>17184 Yeah, NW India is much more zagros heavy and im pretty sure land owning castes in South India are later migrants from IVC right ?
>>17198 I think zagros in south is much older than ivc.
>>17180 Aasi is a bigger joke. Its basically clubbing diverse genetically drifted components together because geneticists dont have proxies for them
>>17219 I dont think so, zagros in south india is probably ivc admixture of aasi plus zagros
>>17230 Zagros arrived in india much before ivc was established so its very likely zagros in south predates ivc.

[Post Reply]
[Index] [Catalog] [Top] R: 32 / P: 9 / Connecting

Theme: