probably for first time in 4 years of kalej i got into a political discussion with a guy and i just ended up showing my true self that i don't care about an individual but overall outcomes and if it means deaths of thousands for millions to prosper and grow.
i ended up showing my machiavellian side where i don't care about whole gynocentric idea of society and i only care about data and numbers but eventually i realised that arguments are unwinnable like this simply cause people prefer optics over facts.
there was an argument where said that bjp is taking all kinds of criminals in it now and i said it doesn't matter, this is how growth happens.
i told him his utopian idealistic society will never come into existence where everything is pure and so called "right"
>>169748
You're being a doomer then. A 100% perfect system is practical. You don't need criminals and corruption to meet basic requirements of growth
Look at China. Top ranking officials get acked if they do dhandhli
If not BJP then who is the most low take to the whole situation
>>169750
Different states have different dynamics. All these states u said i had already predicted the outcome without any emotional thought to it like sir BJP should win. I am better at analytics
>>169743
>i don't care about an individual but overall outcomes and if it means deaths of thousands for millions to prosper and grow.
Who an edgy boy pajeet? Come come edgy boy
