>If AI can create value, why don't the AI companies use their infinite supply of AI to make infinite money for themselves?https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49700477https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49700477>Look AI is coming for CEOs!!!
Why can't they brainstorm business ideas using AI, run the business using AI and make profit? What is even the point of selling this AI to others?
And anyone questioning them is getting cooked in the comments.
>>167413
I hope so. My only fear is that I am coping.
Everybody laughed at Devin and look where we are now. Every software dev tells me AI is writing 99% of the code in their company and they haven't written any code by hand in a year.
People are laughing at Pion now but what if the concept becomes successful in the next two years?
I somewhat agree with this anons take
Ai i meant to be a replacement to human labour that's why they are targeting a specific sector.
human labour is a 22trilion TAM.
But this is just smokes and mirrors
Majority of cost in human capital comes from executive and top leadership roles the bottom and middle part is chump change compare to executive class people fail to see this.
>>167424
For eg a median ceo earns 1500x the intern.
Ai is useless and uneconomical if it can only reduce intern since intern is a cheap gear in the machinery called company. The investment will fail since it cannot replace ceo than the cost cutting will not be felt for the company.
>>167431
On the contrary senior developer and manager get's lot of salaries so if in future if ai is able to replace those huge cost cutting for companies
>>167445
Senior developers will fight back since they have everything to lose.
Maybe unions or idk court case.
It will be interesting to see how ut will play out.
