Saw one parked outside my house yesterday and Pajeets were queuing up to take pics of it.
Crazy how Pajeets will pay close to 1cr for an ‘exotic’ car which every other mutt in North America possesses and crashes into people with. And that too for 20-30% of the Lundian price (even less if it’s used).
>>164915
mustangs are pretty shitty cars so, i partly agree with you.
their appeal here mostly comes from their form and not their function. anyone who has driven a mustang know how big of a boxed shithole these things really are but some of 'em look really cool.
land rovers or mahindras are considerably more expensive in mutt-land. ameritards somewhat consider them as exotic too so, the water flows both ways.
>>164918
Izzatmaxxing
>>164924
Yeah, buying cars you can’t afford on loans is a common phenomenon there.
>>164930
Lund rovers are considered expensive in the UK as well, their manufacturing hub.
>>164931
Same
>>164915
Always thought its a very bad investment to buy luxury cars in India, like where are you even gonna ride it except expressways and highways, majority of road in India aren't in a condition for luxury cars, a black thar or jeep is the only logical car to buy in India
>>164968
I knew a guy from my school who was academically dumb as fuck, didn’t even study after 10th grade and went for a diploma instead. He does baap ka dhanda and drives a mustang now.
>>164998
Such a bad investment, you can't even use the car for what it was made more, have to specifically plan the route just for the low riding car, and then go out at a time where there is no one cause in India some dumbfuck pajeet will jump infront of your wheel to extort you, to go from point A to point B
>>164956
pic related.
>>164968
>muscle cars
sure, whatever the fuck that means. i hope driving it helps you bench press 300 kilos.
stop using marketing terms that's meant to just aid 'em in pawning you off shitty, third-grade, bare-metal, bare-bones, feature-less, gas-guzzling, performance-hungry, yesteryears' car designs.
>>165032
Always wondered how do you categorize something into muscle cars? I can get differentiating something into luxury cause its not practical and affordable but doesn't something have to be like tow truck to be called muscle car?>>165032
>>165040
it's a marketing term coined for retards.
mustangs aren't fast enough to be considered sports. they aren't luxurious enough to be considered exotic/high-end. they aren't strong enough to take-out for off-roading.
therefore, they're "muscle". like, yeah sure, man ... no one knows what that crap actually ever means except for defining something of a frankenstein/abomination of a car.
>>165084
Isn't a thar or a jeep or a g wagon a better option to look manly, also insanely practical for Indian roads and can also offroad, also do "bhaukal" shit in dehat
