for the purpose of this discussion lets assume the number to be 2. that gives us 4 possibilities.
>2 girls
its over. your bloodline ends here. i dont see any merits to this.
>2 boys
basado. literal soldiers can be made out of the lads if the baap is competent enough.
>elder girl younger boy
high risk of thottering out AND the boy being sissyfied because of rizpekts muh didi and shieeet.
>elder boy younger girl
the best combination imo because you get both the genders and a competent baap can raise a competent son who will in turn be very impressionable on the girl.
my personal ranking:
Bg > Bb >> Gb ~ Gg
you may either agree or reason out your rankings.
>>164475
you need to stop with such weak hypotheticals.
>i dont like gays<< saaar what iph you hab a gay son
this is how some of you speak kek.
what i do is not the point here. neither would i send them to an orphanage nor would i ACK them. i am not retarded. i would embrace what is given to me and try my best to raise better human beings. hope that answers your question. please contribute to the discussion or leave the thread.
>>164479
i agree. incompetent parenting can ruin anything and everything. but i do think 2 girls or the elder girl combination needs special attention from the father.
anons with sisters, does beatings of girls by maa, baap or bhai help them to not become goys. If yes then whose beatings are most effective and how often or is there some better strategy you have seen working?
>>164482
mother as well I dont understand why so many people completely ignore a mums responsibilities when it comes to raising children, it takes a good maternal figure to raise responsible and dependable daughter
but that demands she isn't retarded in the first place
>>164485
i agree again. its just that i have seen incompetent baaps ruining things around me more than mothers. be it extended family or friends or anywhere else. maybe i am biased. i feel most mothers perform their duties decently well if not exceptionally. baaps otoh, cant say the same for them.
>>164487
I feel like its a generational chain, incompetent baaps raise maladapated sons, who then themselves become incompetent baaps and it goes on until someone breaks it
>>164484
no. i dont think beating resolves anything. that is not to say to give them a free pass. i have known fathers who have never slapped their kid yet command much more respect and discipline (this includes my father). besides beating a women is useless. it would make her far more radicalized than she is when given any form of freedom.
>>164474
>2 girls
This is unironically the most favourable if you want your "bloodline" to continue. Only 40% of men in history reproduced while 80% of women in history reproduced.
>>164474
I think EGYB is better, the boys are usually chads and do well with girls, wherease older brothers of younger sisters are kind of incels.
t. older brother
>>164492
only x chromosomes get reproduced
your paternal y chromosome dies with you
your fatehr bloodlines ends, x chromosome in father is also coming from some women
Son continues y chromosome
>>164492
you need to leave the thread. all of those xitter stats are shown for other purposes which we are not discussing here. besides, most men died due to wars and no one goes to war now except the minority. and i am from a patrilineal lineage and women dont carry our bloodlines. once she is married off, its over.
>>164474
bb is still better
bbg (3 kids ) is most ideal for me
I wish I had money for three children
oh well
women are whoring themseleves today, its over
>>164493
i see the point you are making. i thought the same when i saw those boys but its a facade. one of my closest friends has 2 elder sisters and is the most incel guy i have known (in-person). and dont you think this view of yours is a bit personal. you are seeing this from the lens of the boy and how he will be good with girls. what about the girl though ? i am seeing this from a parenting perspective. i should have specified it.
>>164497
>most men died due to wars and no one goes to war>women are whoring themselves
I think this is to maintain the natural 40% reproducing male to 80% female ratio. "Tradness" is usually prevalent during wartime and post-war periods. In peacetime women whore out to maintain the ratio.
>>164501
>elder boy younger girl
For what it's worth, I know younger girls who whore out, in peactime all girls will whore out, you cannot do anything about it imo.
>>164499
dont matter
Y chromosome is one of the most rarest thing in this bilogical world of ours,
autosomal makes sense but still, just for rarity, y chromo wins
y chromo diversity should never deplete, it once did in history and caused mayhem
thats why monogomy (first and only of each other) is so important, cause eery new partner corupts the child dna (look into chimerism)
India lost.
whores are whoring
>>164504
you are mixing two things up. it wont matter once she is married off. but i want her to be a respectable and strong women not some whiny bitch. just because she wont be carrying forward my lineage wont mean i stop caring what she does before she is married. and i think your emphasis on the lineage point is too strong. i dont have that strong of a stance. i would prefer to have a boy but wouldnt be averive to a girl.
>>164509
I don't really understand how strong your lineage point is, so I was just saying from your perspective. I personally don't care. Nor do I see muh Y chromosome as special. It is merely one of your lineages, it doesn't magically make you aryan or some crap. Even the same caste has many different Y haplos.
>>164505
so you are claiming that the % of incels who are elder brothers > those with elder sisters
i see no merit to your point except projecting your insecurities. i suppose you havent seen controlling elder sisters who have totally castrated their younger brothers let alone make them "chad" as you are saying.
>>164507
not at all. the girls i have seen around me, who are of respectable character are all with strong father and / or brother figures and it will remain to be that way. pessimistic worldview.
>>164509
>but i want her to be a respectable and strong women not some whiny bitch
I think for women it doesn't matter tbh parents matter more. Like elder girl and younger girl are whiny or strong based on parents not based on sibling. Whereas for guys, parents play a role, of course, but sibling matters, younger boy with elder girl results in more chads on average.
>>164513
Yes, that is my claim. It is a general trend which I have observed, it's not my insecurities.
>i suppose you havent seen controlling elder sisters who have totally castrated their younger brothers let alone make them "chad" as you are saying.
I haven't seen, I don't deny that such cases exist, but what I am saying is on average. Not a 100% gaurantee that elder sister -> chad brother.
>>164503
no whoring out hurts everybody
chimerism distorts everything
war heavily affects y chromo diversity
it adds no benefits mitr, I am talking from civilisational point of view, han chinese are suffering from this
aggarwal community sufers from this, brahmin community is spread across all india , and can somewhat navigate, bt some jatt communities have been victim of this too
y chromo is not researched much for this. I swear, this entire whoredom will stop , once chimerism will come out
anyhow, dna editing will come first I guess.
They will never stop whoredom>>164509
yea, make a stong women out of your child, someone whom other women can look upto. With long sighted mind, she must inherity good virtue>>164510
every chapri in delhi metro is a whore nowadays, I have seen too much anon
some mall employee's get off when i come out at 5 , and most of them are couples, NCR is dead wasteland.
I wont call a women brahmin if she aint virgin
virgin bride, impossible nowadays
>>164511
Belive me anon, the more I digged into this the more it mkes you hollow
reminds me of fiat currency shenanigans
y chromo , eugenics, epigenetics are not to be studies
and yet the wanna circumcise men, its a sign of slavery
>>164517
father figure is important for both, sir. but a brother is needed for a girl because the father has his limitations which he cant impose on the daughter.
>>164516
when you say on average, what data do you have in mind except for your own experiences ? if none, then we can safely assume that point to be null and void. if there is something you do have, please share.
>>164520
Such as?
>impose on daughter
I've not seen it tbh. Maybe I am richer than you all. But the brother rarely enforces anything it is always parents who do so.
>>164521
I have observed 4-5 cases where the incel had a younger sister, and 4-5 cases where a chad had an older sister. I can only think of 1 case for each where it was reversed.
Scientists should find a way to edit the genes of a embryo so that everyone could have male children. Literally no need for females, the world will be a better place for everyone.
>>164518
One of the most blackpilling stuff I read somewhere on 4chan was that in usa in the early 2000s and late 90s if you took a camera at a girl, she would literally block the camera with her hand and not let you take a picture of her. A girl letting you take a photo of her was a sign that she trusted you. I cannot imagine that as a zoomer, every chick is completely okay with her being displayed on public like on instagram that too in an era where deepfakes can be made.
>>164524
Rope faggot
>>164523
Sure, so maybe.
>>164523
>personal experiences
Our observations of the world are based of personal expereinces, we make conjectures with such things. I don't have access to emperical data of no of sexual partners of a man and wether they had an elder sister to actually prove it.
>>164528
>calling us a faggot>literally wants to reproduce with men
Unironically the closest people with your views are the librandus. I met some guy in college who talked about how muh males can get pregnant in the future saar with technology.
>>164527
indeed our worldview is shaped by our personal experiences but we must avoid making claims on objective statements without empirical data.
as for the usa blackpill you spoke about, i think it has more to do with internet safety. earlier, the internet was a grim place where all sorts of weird people hung out or as we name it, the wild west. no internet safety is taught by pajeet parents. no one thinks that normies on bhangigram will engage in deepfake niggery. normies have totally shut their brains off.
>>164526
I dont wanna say that we need to go back, but women literally used to goto malls and say we aare looking for boys in USA
there are clips of that,it continued till 2005, social media has made some wierd things happen to west
in our place, it has shown whoredom
MY mausa, literally told me, how common affair are in T2 city he lives
and said, things were always same here, just that, it gets more advertised now and more people know where to lookup
I pay homage to my ancestors who got it all right
This is a sick society anon
I woke up in teen years,I had so much chance fpor pussy, just let it go cause i thought that I would only do it with my main partner, now all women are whore, every year new junior womena re more whore than their older ones
>>164533
>no one thinks that normies on bhangigram will engage in deepfake niggery. normies have totally shut their brains off.
I think a lot of women or like every woman knows about it yet they still post.
>>164540
holy kek. i didnt think you were this dumb. a claim is an assertive statement, a conjecture is not. what you did was claim and then mask it as a conjecture. no more (you)s faggot.
>>164543
shubh awsar hai aaj. rassi latak ja chamaar.
>>164518
>epigenetics are not to be studies
I've read some stuff about epigenetics, epigenetics is the opposite of blackpill tbh. It gives me hope
>eugenics
I know what it is but havent read much. I think disabled people shouldn't reproduce but thats it and high iq people should be incentivized by the goverment to have more kids.
>y chromo
Dunno much about it except basics, tell sirs.
>>164553
>>164554
are you retarded ? both a claim and a conjecture can be false. they need not be a fact otherwise they would be labelled facts. you claimed that on average blah blah blah blah but when asked for evidence you lacked any which is what the other anon is trying to explain to you.
>>164540
>>164553
you do realize this is a self-own right ?
>a claim is a conjecture>a claim is not automatically a conjecture
>>164557
what you said is a conjecture, no one disagress lol. just stop saying it the way you said. that makes it a claim.
>>164474
Giving birth in 2026 is skewed. If you give birth now your child might have DNA of multiple men inside them and they might have character traits of precious partners of your wife
>>164560
you cant convince me this chan isnt infested with chamaars and bhangis with profound mental retardation. its either them or wordcelling plebbit goyim.
kys faggot.
>>164561
Can't think properly in the mornings. Kinda sleepy.
>>164560
You guys always yap about chimerism but I genuinely cannot find anything about that stuff online. How would DNA of past men affect development of the kid, it's only the sperm(yours) and the egg (hers) who make the kid. I don't see how any third party could affect it.
>>164563
Seethe more faggot. Once someone cums inside a girl. Once the sperm fuses with the brain. The DNA of the man is permenently stores in the women's brain. If she gives birth the DNA is also transferred to the child
>>164576
yaar bhangi its not the own you think it is. okay mr.pajeet kumar, let me ask you. what is your mashter pilaan to escape this yourself. how will you ensure your children get the same shitskin retarded DNA as you and dont get it mixed up ?
