[Index] [Catalog] [Bottom] R: 13 / P: 6 / Connecting

File: 764eegjipo74cva77i.jpg (117.3KB, 671x498)
Post Image
Dome architectural element was brought to india by muzzie invaders. Today even temples have incorporated it. Should we retain it or ditch it?
>>162642 we should replace it with a big penis 𓂸
No temple have incorprated muzzie/byzantine architecture
>>162653 I have seen many temples with domes
>>162642 >>162662 Which temple you are talking about yaar no temple have domes
>>162663 Akshardham for example
>>162670 That's mordern temple
>>162670 >>162671 yaar retards take a look at it. From which angle it looks islamic to you. no real temple have muslim style central large dome. And dome thing isn't islamic
>>162671 Should it be retained in your opinion?
>>162691 Dome is not native to india. We had corbelled shikharas and vimanas but no true domes.
>>162642 Dome was actually a byzantine christian architectural element that got appropriated by arab mullas.
there is no such thing as arab and hence islamic architecture, nowhere in arabia you will find anything like that.
Islam when came into contact with byzantine and iranian civilisation, appropriated a lot of cultural elements.
>>162724 True but it was brought to india by muzzie invaders. We had corbelled shikharas, vimanas and chhatris but true domes are an import.

[Post Reply]
[Index] [Catalog] [Top] R: 13 / P: 6 / Connecting

Theme: