How bad would it be for the economy if women were to be banned from having any kind of jobs tomorrow?
Would it be terrible for the entire world or would we be able to adapt well and the world would go on fine without them?
>>161647
There was a famous incident recently where all women in Iceland protested by not doing any job and nothing changed because most women just did meme jobs like hr and marketing that had no actual impact on economy.
>>161664
>>161670
Then why do we even allow them to work? At least without jobs they would be dependent on us. Yes, they still won't love us like they love chad but at least we would have some power. Right now sub5s literally have no power.
I feel like no employment for women + early marriage can make things better.
>>161662
>Also a family where 2 people have salary can afford more things than just one person contributing
Wouldn't a man earn twice as much as they do now if women's jobs were taken away?
>Saaar trast me it is the the joos doing it, bharat birth rate are falling due to the jews we are superior himan capital saar whole world would be devstated by this news saar
Kek torsissy never leave a chance to out yourself as brainlet
>>161691
It is not jew but natural selection
Just look at population griwth in last century heck even last 50 years in crazy
you think all of extra humans will survive ? No
>>161672
They were trying to recreate the famous 1975 women's day off event.
But the difference between then and now was that back then, women actually did important jobs to economy in manufacturing and agricultural/fishing sector (which was the major portion of Iceland's economy back then) as opposed to now where the mostly did bs service jobs.
>>161717
It's pure bs man
>>161699
https://fortune.com/2026/09/04/jobs-report-september-women-162000-jobs/https://fortune.com/2026/09/04/jobs-report-september-women-162000-jobs/> non farm payrolls
Women gained around 68,000 jobs in leisure and hospitality, even as the whole sector added only 62,000, meaning men lost 6,000 jobs in the sector.
food service and drinking places added 59,000 jobs, while local government education added another startling 42,000
Education, hospitality, food service
>>161672
Not really , only for neets and incel it will be good
> Right now sub5s literally have no power
you do , think in different way
no reason to have power over women
you can go out and fuck these bitches , love say you are not ready have no accountability and live a happy life
Right now is best time ever men lived
all who say sub5 are nuts you can level up not run behind love and be happy
love is a social construct
>>161721
>It's pure bs man
Then you point out the stats ?
Even if bs official statement bls shows more than 50% in all areas which have good pay aside from shitty jobs
>>161676
if that happens a couple will realise in a world of 2x jobs they both can work and get 4x until everyone else also catches up. yeah if ban happens, but in a libertarian society this is the end point
>>161731
that was jobs gained not net employment men are actively being replaced by women , only high iq jobs which need men will remain those are few in number and we arent that high iq
Sector wise employment % >>161734
>>161743
Yup, wont affect india right now bur in a 5 years maybe 10 at max it will creep into india and many men will be left unemployed , why do you think they are giving women benifits although main reason is women trust more and will vote if its profits them but not a nation as whole but another is to keep them happy and unemployed for a while
men are losing jobs and women gaining in india as well this is happening rapidly
as men get more and more low test, simp , cucks whatever you call them in few men will be happy to do house work while women is breadwinner
One example is classmates i knew in 11th who just wanted a hot working wife while they chill at home
just get a job asap and have good relation with women at work esp hr, the ones who hire etc be actively looking for other jobs
if you are neet go prep for any grade gober
Be warned , dont engage in any sort of acitvity with women aside from work dont share socials or other stuff in your life and resign if you start liking a women at work
>>161802
>>161815
I am the same guy
for
>>161815
source Report or trust me bro ? No hate
Even if they ar,e women can take on less paying jobs that pay the bills and no one will judge
If you say is true then men are also losing jobs to ai and they cannot get other low paying jobs since they have to put food on the table and have family to feed only thing jobs they can get are low paying labour jobs which need body, take a lot of time stopping them from leveling up and making them permanant underclass unless he gets a goverment job in india
>>161856
However, overall women's conditions are actually getting worse day by day.
>they cannot get other low paying jobs since they have to put food on the table and have family to feed
Actually the complete opposite lmao. Men have more disposable income while women have an entire family to feed due to increase in single motherhood driven by divorce. That's the actual reason for the female breadwinner myth you posted a while, it's not driven by men becoming dependant on women but by rise in single motherhood leading to most of these women having to look after their children alone.
>>161856
More of a reason to hire women
>All of yours is just coping.
what part ? I would like to know to improve
using >>161741 as ref
>only high iq jobs which need men will remain those are few in number and we arent that high iq
which also alligns with what you are saying since most high iq jobs will have higher pay than women
>>161865
Donr divorcee women get a shit ton of moeny as alimony ?
>That's the actual reason for the female breadwinner myth
I am not saying it is current situation but in 7-10 yrs as new gen of male grow up they see their single mother working hard and being breadwinner they think women are suited for that role and will help in household, while others become low test,simps who also want their wife working
>Men have more disposable income
This is a very bias statement since only the ones who have good family and whose dad pension is running what about other ? Which accounts for major households
>>161867
>more reasons you hire a woman
Lol, that's not how it works lmao. If so companies will be hiring chapris to do principal engineering jobs because their wages are really low.
>how is it coping
Because your report is just reporting rebound effects. Even the link you shared says so.
Also in your chart the highest representation is in private tutoring, I don't know if you're awarebut that's even lower than blue collar wagies(like mining and construction, the women have least representation in) in America. I guess you think it might be same as in here there. In fact blue collar wagies overall have better wages compared to their service sector class citizens except maybe in the high end which are all dominated by men(in your chart it's 45% women).
The only sectors they are higher than men in your chart is leisure and hospitality (aka waiter jobs), financial (like store clerks and stuff), and government (the only actual relevant field they dominate).
>>161876
>Donr divorcee women get a shit ton of moeny as alimony
No lol
>I am not saying it is current situation but in 7-10 yrs as new gen of male grow up they see their single mother working hard and being breadwinner they think women are suited for that role and will help in household, while others become low test,simps who also want their wife working
It didn't happen in African American communities who had single motherhood for almost a century now, what makes you think it'll happen for others lmao. Sorry anon but your femdom fantasy isn't happening.
>This is a very bias statement since only the ones who have good family and whose dad pension is running what about other ? Which accounts for major households
What are you even rambling about lmao. I'm talking in context of developed economies, not pajeetia.
>>161867
>More of a reason to hire women
That's not how it works lmao. Google doesn't hire a chapri and make him lead a project because he'll ask less money. That's a kimdergardeners
/leftists understanding of how wages works (durr companies only care about profit so they get the lowest paid, forget that most faang companies run at a loss lmao).
Wage gap is reflective of actual demand gap
it would be good actually, as those women can be used to make babies nonstop, and as we know men are better than women, so eventually an all man economy will outpace its past at astronomical scales
>>161902
Two diff things one was refering to india and other usa stats for op who asked
>How bad would it be for the economy if women were to be banned from having any kind of jobs tomorrow?
and
>>161815 who was saying that the jobs that women will gain in india in 7-10 years will replaced by ai to which i replied >>161839 for which replied showing US wage gap stats ?
>>161902
Mines are run by unions which have higher pay but mining jobs are very less
>>161893
Not what i mean according to >>161856 it refers to women with same education, skills and yoe in USA so it makes more of a sense to higher then
> highest representation is in private tutoring
look at finance which has 54% for usa
most bluw collar jobs are done by 'aliens' to quite trump and go unreported, looks at the numbers not only pecentage
>>161897
>no lol
In india i meant
>It didn't happen in African American
in india again
>femdom fantasy
not mine but most gen z
>What are you even rambling about lmao. I'm talking in context of developed economies, not pajeetia.
i was talking in context india
>>161839
>>161876
>>161771
in all above post
the ones you refrencing are for usa
>>161931
The one reply which started this was >>161856
In which i was speaking in context on india
since this isnt 4chan nor are you and never will i live in USA
Despite India being a turd world shithole our economy is very similar to developed systems with high dependency on service sector.
And the reason why we use usa is because they track everything as honestly as politically allowed whereas india doesn't even do that.
If u want indian research sadly u won't get anything.
>>161932
>>161935
>>161940
>>161944
>>161932
>Two diff things one was refering to india and other usa stats for op who asked
Your stats was explicitly reporting about America.
>that the jobs that women will gain in india in 7-10 years will replaced by ai to which i replied
Women have the highest representation in your chart in teaching. That's the most at risk of being replaced by AI.
>Mines are run by unions which have higher pay but mining jobs are very less
Doesn't change anything I said.
>women with same education, skills
That's extremely contextual. Two people with same education, yoe don't become equivalent lmao. There's an actual skill gap that can't be represented in data like this.
>look at finance which has 54% for usa
I've already reported on finance here lol >>161931
>most bluw collar jobs are done by 'aliens'
That's irrelevant here.
>in india again
Again, your femdom fantasy isn't happening anywhere, period.
>not mine but most gen z
It's fine, we won't kink shame you.
>>161935
For the last time, when posting mutt stats, stop using the retarded excuse , "b-but india".
>>161940
>projection
*fantasy
>>161951
If you're talking about projection, these jobs used to be low pay in the past in America too, while teaching was paid more.
But that was a time when teaching was male dominated and there's a large surplus of young men, two things that won't be true for India in the future lmao.
>>161951
>we use usa is because they track everything
It wont be remotely close to situation in close to communist india
>>161955
>Your stats was explicitly reporting about America
yes and the thing which you replied to was for india assuming everyone here is in india and stays here for next decade or so
>Women have the highest representation in your chart in teaching.
Read 'in india'
>Doesn't change anything I said.
there arent 10k jobs every year for mining in usa which both men and women fight for unions operate in most nepo ways afaik
>skill gap that can't be represented in data like this.
what said skill gap ? Give example
>That's irrelevant here.
no , you are showing official stats for very few jobs in which alien dont work
i can easily counter argue all you jpgs
>Again, your femdom fantasy isn't happening anywhere, period
heh ?
>For the last time, when posting mutt stats, stop using the retarded excuse , "b-but india".
retard you arent living in usa with clean air and laws which humans follow
stop fucking saying 'oh but amrika has' it dosent fucking help me, you or anyone else living in this turd world shithole
do you recieve same pay as a amrikan ? No (aside from working for us based)
then stop arguing with amerikan stats use indians stats if you dont have just say what you feel like from your exp or history
>>161955
Also finance also have high risk of being replaced by AI. Government is a tricky one because women are mostly represented at the lower levels which can be replaced by at higher levels men dominate.
About the only two fields women have it safe are hospitality (aka waiter jobs) and healthcare. Hospitality is a meme field, it's dominated by men in India, think about those bimaru waiters and tourist guides lol. In Amrika, women do those but pajeet izzat hate seeing their women do it lol.
Healthcare have decent wages.
>>161984
Just say your thoughts about india future
I am speaking to with context of india since this >>161771
before that i was answering OP's question which >>161731 is his ans
After that i was talking about india, you only read till >>161740 which was what will happen if women were banned from working tomorrow
>>161977
That's the problem nigga india didn't conduct such a large scale study we use americunts data because it gives us a ballpark to point to.
Why can't u understand this simple shit?
>>161977
>the thing which you replied to was for india assuming everyone here is in india and stays here for next decade or so
That's not how it happens lmao. Read this >>161960
>Read 'in india'
Again, think bhangi think. Do you think wage gap will remain constant?
>there arent 10k jobs every year for mining in usa
Again, don't change a thing I said.
>what said skill gap ? Give example
Given two people, one build an entire app with millions of users, one only have an app with 1000 users. Both have 2 yoe, same degree and same skill of python dev. Whom do you think is more likely to be hired?
>no , you are showing official stats for very few jobs in which alien dont work
Again, we are talking about men vs women, them being 'aliens' is irrelevant here lol. Or do you believe all of them are women even though just googling trucker videos only show men? Lmao.
>retard you arent living in usa with clean air and laws which humans follow
I don't know how that's relevant here lol.
And it's more brootal for women if we use Indian stats lmao.
>>161998
>ballpark to point to.
you are air balling it
>>161931
>>161922
>>161902
This wont ever happen in india ever period
You have changed from
>You must first of all stop applying pajjetia concept of wages to amrika lmao.
In >>161922
To
>we use americunts data because it gives us a ballpark to point to.
>>162004
>Again, we are talking about men vs women, them being 'aliens' is irrelevant here lol. Or do you believe all of them are women even though just googling trucker videos only show men? Lmao.
this gotta be bait man
the stats and data you are using does not account for aliens
>I don't know how that's relevant here lol.
Comon man , you read the all that shit still dont get it
>And it's more brootal for women if we use Indian stats lmao.
USE THEM THEN
>>162005
Are you genuinely retarded? You bought up American stats to the conversation but when people talked about them, your reply is 'b-but muh pajeeria'.
Again, answer my question retard. Do you think wage gaps stay constant?
>>162014
read >>161995
the amrikan stats were to show op what happens when women get banned from work tomorrow
>American stats to the conversation but when people talked about them,
AGAIN they were brought twice to answer OP question
what are you even arguing against ?
cause i feel baited
> answer my question retard. Do you think wage gaps stay constant?
no they can decrease or increase
>>162018
Ik but the point still helps his side of arguement and i have lost which side he is on
>>162013
>the stats and data you are using does not account for aliens
And your theory is, their wages might be lower if you account for them? Lmao.
>Comon man , you read the all that shit still dont get it
Again answer my question lol
Do you think wage gaps will stay constant?
>USE THEM THEN
Even average it coolie salaries in India is lower than porotta makers my nigga.
>>162025
>the amrikan stats were to show op what happens when women get banned from work tomorrow
No, you brought up those stats while describing your femdommy mommy paradise about women dominating men lmao.
>>162028
>And your theory is, their wages might be lower if you account for them?
yes lamoing reatard aliens get paid pennies compared to their citizen counterparts
>>162033
I never said women dominate or bs like that stop projecting
I said women will higher % in work force comapred to men in 7-10 years
and men who remain unemployed will have to take care of house
there was never mention of women dominating men in any sexual or other context
9>>162031
>what are you arguing against
Do you genuinely believed based on these le projections(which haven't been true for muttland) that men will live dependant on women?
>>162034
You know another field that is also dominated by aliens? Healthcare and hospitality.
>>162043
No, that will never happen but the % of men trying to find work while being dependent on women and
Working men co-depended on women in household expense or major emi's like house , not a good example but cars etc will increase significantly compared to right now
Men wont have 'power' over women
>>162043
You think there are more aliens in Healthcare and hospitality that too in amerkan healthcare where insurance rules than jeets in trucking or tacos in cunstruction or niggers in mining ?
>>162042
>I said women will higher % in work force comapred to men in 7-10 years
The chart you posted(where 50.1 percentage of workforce are women) is less than the actual representative male to female ratio in US(which is .98 males for every 100 females) Also include agriculture and that gap reduces.
>and men who remain unemployed will have to take care of house
Which makes this entire premise retarded and a fantasy.
>>162052
I said the green text for india
>Which makes this entire premise retarded and a fantasy
While trying to find employment in a shit econ it wont be fantasy men are becoming pussies
>>162051
>Men wont have 'power' over women
That's not the point.
>but the % of men trying to find work while being dependent on women and
Working men co-depended on women in household expense or major emi's like house
Again pure copium.
>>162051
>amerkan healthcare where insurance rules than jeets
Do you think most healthcare wagies are daktaars and registered nurses?
>hospitality
I dunno, probably as much as trucking, maybe even more.
>>162069
>Again pure copium.
nope
what do you think will happen
ignore prev shit and answer this
What do you think will happen in india and why im context to men and women gender roles in hosue and in workforce
>Do you think most healthcare wagies are daktaars and registered nurses?
yes cause companies united health will fuck the hospital over
>I dunno, probably as much as trucking, maybe even more.
in amerika ? Hell nah
>>162079
>What do you think will happen in india
I think coomers will discover they can live their femdommy mommy fantasy in VR instead of predicting it'll happen to economies at scale.
>yes cause companies united health will fuck the hospital over
Do you know what most healthcare jobs is? Not daktaars and nurses. Hint: it starts with C and ends with R. You see a lot of them when you visit an old age home.
>in amerika ? Hell nah
Again do you know what most hospitality jobs are? Do you know what AoC worked as when she first immigrated to muttland?
>>162091
>I think coomers will discover they can live their femdommy mommy fantasy in VR instead of predicting it'll happen to economies at scale.
again i am saying women will have equal share in household expense
but seriously what do you think will happen in 5 years and in 7-10 years
