>>156563
pajeets will ignore reality until it is already too late, then seethe why no one else did anything, then ultimately cope spiritually
it is a leitmotif in indian history, from mughals to british, whenever each btfod jeets, jeets relied on 3000 saal ka itihas and vimana soyeince
>>156563
But he only has 1 billion pajeets what can he even do against 7 billion remaining people?
He will have the most cucked veg eating cucks stunted children and skinny fat as his soldiers do u seriously think he will win?
How do u think it will end!
Saged
>>156569
>>156571
Use sage for this type of obvious baits niggers.
>>156573
I want me to be thier saviour
I want to piss on them and they drink it up saying it's rain.
My only mission for my life is this.
Saged.
>>156577
Wow this is a new type of thinking I'm impressed.
>>156584
no, naval mutiny was quickly subdued, red fort trials were a joke, seriously jeets should not kang about the cowards of ina and fil, both surrendered the chance they got and were a disaster in combat, clement atlee only acted on the existing circumstances, which would be the same even with Churchill, before ww2 britain was a global creditor after ww2 it was heavily indebted, they even owed india money, they could not afford to continue to administer and land and pay salaries, so they had to go
>>156600
Naval mutiny was significant. Ever since 1857 brits in india suffered from paranoia of any future mutiny and bloodshed occuring. You can read Dyer's justification after jallianwalabagh massacre. They were clearly paranoid of repeat of 1857. When they saw their grip over military was slipping away they chose to quickly leave gracefully than to wait for mutiny and bloodshed.
>>156611
independence negotiations was a couple months away either way, that is why most of the future political class didn't support it, if it turned into a real army wide mutiny that the military would come in power and not them, if it only largely accelerated it, the military would feel mutinying is the right way to deal with political grievances
>>156622
>>156625
Well no point in dwelling on hypotheticals. Post 1911 brits were running india at net loss anyway so it is very much possible ww2 only accelerated the inevitable. We likely would have got independence not much later even without ww2.
>>156638
British rule was an improvement overall but lets not overrate them. Yes i am aware the economy grew under them, they brought tech, medicine and rule of law but we have clearly done a better job after independence.
>>156640
What has these soycialist republic achieved in 80 years? Politicians here can't think beyond shoshit vanshit and naari shakti.
India is in the same position as it was in 1947.
One of my favourite thing about the Raj is that they gave the chance to Indians, good indians were second only to whitemen in the raj.
The only hindus that exist outside India, and are doing well is cuz of Hindus. The hindu class that brits pampered and took to the rando british colonies are doing great. They are the reason there are better doing hindus in countries lie maurtius, trinidad, fiji, south africa.
In fiji and uganda, the hindus literally became the overlords of natives.
>>156646
Mumbai, Kolkata, New delhi are the gifts of Brits.
Brits are the one who deislamized India, without them it would be the marathi barbarians who would free us from muslim pests.
You can guess which one is better, marathis or the anglos.
>>156646
We didn't have any famine
We are among ONLY 10 countries' to have space program
ONLY among 9 who have nuclear power.
Have top5 airforce top 3 landtroops top 10 navy
We have second most metros
Second highest steel production
Second highest coal production
Top 3 in cotton production
Top 1 in spice top 1 in rice top 3 in agricultural production in quantity wise.
We have 3rd biggest expressway
we have 5th biggest peaceful nuclear program
The list is endless if i keep describing we both will grow old together.
Yea true in top oecd countries we do not hold candle to them
But if taken out of 200 cuntries we are not at bottom and definitely not even in middle we are at the edge of the top players and that's not bad we started at absolutely bottom then anyone else who are at the top.
>>156653
We are the most populous country of the world. Remember it.
>We didn't have any famine
Thanks to WASP Chads and the pongas who did green revolution
>We are among ONLY 10 countries' to have space program>ONLY among 9 who have nuclear power.>Have top5 airforce top 3 landtroops top 10 navy>We have second most metros
nothing to flex
>Second highest steel production>Second highest coal production>Top 3 in cotton production>Top 1 in spice top 1 in rice top 3 in agricultural production in quantity wise.
It's cuz of brits btw
>We have 3rd biggest expressway>we have 5th biggest peaceful nuclear program>The list is endless if i keep describing we both will grow old together
Lol
>>156653
>We didn't have any famine
picrel is the cause of that, and it is worldwide, nothing special in pajeetia
it also depends on GAS, which is used to make urea
and this is fucked because of hormuz
there will be a famine in 2028, if not 2027
