[Index] [Catalog] [Bottom] R: 12 / P: 8 / Connecting

File: muslims-are-praying-at-the-kaa(...) (53.2KB, 768x432)
Post Image
Do we know exactly if it was the zutt place of Muhammad(PBUH) and that there was a Muhammad's hut there before Masjid? I know there was a Hut there as evident from excavated remains but how do we know for sure it was a Hutt and Muhammad got Zutt?
Its said in the hadiths and dont you dare question the hadiths pajeet
>>152444 There are historical sources for that. I was the one who made other post. Idk why you are so offended. I am hindu myself. I was looking for historical sources regarding presence of ram mandr at babri site.
>>152446 Yoi took your time to give justification is enough to out yourself as butthurt k2a.
>>152447 Pointless discussion. Show historical evidence that babri site was regarded as ram janmbhoomi by hindus. I 100% support babri masjid's demolition because it was built on temple but wheres the evidence of it being janmbhoomi
File: ClipboardImage.png (21.0KB, 130x113)
Post Image
>>152453 Aur ro k2e
>>152444 it was a pagan temple of pre Islamic arabs, "allah" himself was a pagan god with 3 daughters Al lat, Al uzza and Manat
>>152453 Yaar bhangi just enjoy the demolition na. Hindus just follow ram and hinudism out of tradition, we all just want muslim to get cucked and out of bharat
>>152464 If there were no muslim hinduism would have died to randism thousands of years ago.
>>152445 And no one with critical mind believes islamic mythology. What is clear from historical evidence tho is that muzzie tradition and islamic sources regarded kaba as holy site. Do we have any similar evidence from precolonial era that 'ram janmbhoomi' was always believed by hindus to be janmbhoomi
File: ClipboardImage.png (70.9KB, 640x438)
Post Image
>>152469 Naha le
>>152469 Why did no authors like Tulsidas who was a ram devotee and contemporary og mughals ever record babri having been built on janmbhoomi

[Post Reply]
[Index] [Catalog] [Top] R: 12 / P: 8 / Connecting

Theme: