>>147609
15 rajputnis in total from four kingdoms married to mughal emperors is literally literally nothing compared to population. Lets not forget most muslims in subcontinent are jats, gujjars, kanglus and pasmanda OBC converts. Rajputs are still hindus.
>>147608
>Pajeet history kang is basically who got less raped musal bulls throughout the history.
Nah. Only caste unionists do that. Virat hindus celebrate all who resisted them be it krishna devraya, pratap, shivaji, lachit borpukhan, ranjit singh.
>>147658
Nah not really. Only Amber(jaipur) was somewhat significant. Marwar is arid small kingdoms. Mewar was the centre of power in rajputana because it had stronger agrarian economy due to rivers. Also it was just 15 rajput princesses married so who cares? Bulk of population is native and had no unions with pooghals.
>>147667
3 Mewar Princess were married to Akbar alone, keep crying Raju. Mughals defeated every single Rajpoo kingdom and made them vassal state, majority of these marriages weren't forced, it was an offer to come close to power
>>147672
>majority of these marriages weren't forced.
Stop lying through your teeth. All those marriages happened under threat of war and destruction. Yes akbar rewarded his allies well but he used threat of war to force them into his empire.
