the jat royal family of bharatpur claims they are descendants of neighbouring rajput royal family of karauli
as the story goes, a rajput prince captured a jat in the forest and raped his wife in front of him. this started the lineage which produced surajmal jat.
(thank jesus. surajmal jat raped mussals of all creed)
>>144805
All Jat royal families claim Rajput ancestory, the punjab ones - Phulkian dynasty (patiala and other state) descend from Rao Bhati, the founder of Bhati Clan of Rajputs.
>>144805
He is a product of ICM. His mother is rajput and he has daddy issues and identity crisis. His dad the actual titular maharaj of bharatpur denies any descent from rajputs. They claim direct descent from krishna himself.
https://www.reddit.com/r/UNITEDJATFRONT/comments/1llnlz0/about_the_bharatpur_controversy/https://www.reddit.com/r/UNITEDJATFRONT/comments/1llnlz0/about_the_bharatpur_controversy/
>>144834
Its all based on biased sources. Not all jat kings claimed rajput descent. Ranjit singh did not. Some like surajmal claimed descent from krishna like most kings of that time did hence claiming indirect relationship to rajputs but thats different from direct descent from rajputs.