>>136366
No atheist exists in india since neither of them has valid reason to not follow a faith. Such as benevolent paradox or needless suffering in design. Its just full grown faggots having an edgy phase on internet because his parents did not give him attention.
>inb4 what does that mean
Chamar ki itni buddhi nahi ki he can be "muh atheist". He is either a bhimta or a buckbroken by lefty ideology. Any person larping as muh atheist is just retarded, kill them before mullas.
>>136366
But whats the solushan. They cant be deported. Its not feasible. There are 20cr. of them in india. Thats around the population of pak and kangludesh.
>>136381
So you want them to genocide and rape us? cause it is us vs them you cannot have morals and high IQ with muzzies who believe fully in a 7th century book
>>136394
Feminism is a meme, not a single real feminist exists in jeetland. When was the last time awkward gawk gawk throat goat cruticised islam? Soch ek baar pajeet pyare. All of them, nothing but paid shills. Gender war is a bait to break ethnic and religious unity, and women are less intelligent. So they fall for it.
>>136409
Yeah pajeet are too retarded to see it themself. No such thing as Atheism or Feminism happens in india. Gender war if we were to factor it will easily point towards a specific community. Women choose to blur it 2ith "it is all men" rather than saying "this one specific group of men do all of it". It is because they are paid shills.
>>136413
No. Its one thing to claim that "I dont hold belief in god since logically there is no valid reason or evidence that a being like that exists". A true Atheist doesnt care about what a "Hindu" or "Arya" does. He still has common sense. These are just wanna be libtard who learned a new word, midwit fags.
>>136420
Most atheists in India are performative. They haven't touched a scripture in their life. They read a book or watch a documentary and act superior after that.
>>136424
Nah, Nastika is rejection of Theism and Orthodoxy, but it does not deny no celestian greater force exists. The nireshwara status is outside both the dharmic and hindu fold as a result. It is aknowledged hoever.
>>136426
>Most atheists in India are performative
All of them, none of them have ability to back up their belief. Majority of the faggots are anti theist, and rest of them are agnostic, and both of them are too retarded to have a valid cause to be Atheist. Ofcourse Atheism is a thing, and its valid. Its just most pajeet are just being pajeet when they say "muh Atheism" lmao.
>>136425
Theism= belief in god
Atheism = lack of belief in god
Agnosticism = makes no claim of knowledge
Anti theism=active opposition to theism
Agnostic theists are a thing
Again, you are an NPC with no knowledge of what these words mean
>>136426
I dont need to read scriptures. Show the evidence. There are gorillion philosophy books to be read. Nothing against philosophy but i need evidence to believe in god.
>>136424
You cannot show evidence for god that is the whole point of religion. It is based on theology and meta physical concepts. There are a lot of things that science itself still cannot prove.
>>136434
Thats what atheism means. Hard atheists believe there is no god but atheism in and of itself is simply the lack of belief in god. This is why arguing with NPCs like you is waste of time.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheismhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atheism
>>136443
Technically pushing science on faith is a bad idea because it tends to change with time. This is called limit of time fallacy. Pushpak Vimana is good and solid example of it. People could not take flying vessel at face value so a lot of hypothesis were thrown that it was a watch tower. Then planes came to be and everyone is like saar it was thr first plane saar. Just take some of it at face value and some meta physically, rather than rationalising it with what limited knowledge we hold.
>>136438
Sure buddy kikes like einstein are not saving you from hell or heaven or reincarnation after you die because science still cannot and never will prove what would happen after we die. Good luck burning in hell.
>>136452
I mean it makes no difference if they do not exist. Just saying. Worrying about if they exist or not is kind of irrelevant subject and considered infantile in theology.
>>136456
No, i mean even if it was real i am well sorted to go to heaven. Once you are a brahmin you can only go up. There is no further place to ascend to for us V1 beyond pitra and bhuva loka, if not swarga.
But if you are being "good" because you fear you will be punished. It is just you being a douche bag. That is why worrying if hell and heaven are real or not is comsidered infantile in most take of theology. Since it should make no difference upon your morality. You should not need existence of hell to tell you "making jokes about raping a woman is bad". I mean, god if they do exist they are not blind or stupid yes? its common sense, and that is how all shastras tackle it too.
>>136457
Well actually this is where polytheism fragments heavily from monotheism. PIE as a whole is like this. You can be a horrible Arya and get thrown in the naraka and be sariyad (literally) but you can be a very very very kind and compassionate mllecha.
The order of Astika, Nastika, Nireshwara, Mllecha only exisrs to get rid of chaos on "our" perspective, hoeever since we did not keep that hiearchy alive, there is no real reason, say Chandra Shekhar to go to heaven because he is darmica while shoe on head to go to hell since she is Mllecha.
Your morality and your faith are funfamentally independent. Dharma just makes ot easy to end up in heaven, you can brute force being a good man, or skip being an Arya almost entirely.
>>136460
I mean pretty much most people tend to believe. Even agnostic and some atheist subconciously fear there is something in dark, and "what if". We are irrational creatures after all. This is least of reasons to make fun of any person.
>>136458
Brahmin can only up. This is the kind of retarded arguments muzzies use when they haven't read a hindu scripture in their life. Learn about varna system first before saying some retarded crap like this
>>136468
But you literally can only go to pitra loka after reaching V1. This is how the varna system works. You try to reach the holiest spot, and then you try the best to not be a retard. If you do it well enough to Swarga, Bhuva or Pitru loka you end up in.
You seem to be taking offence over absolutely nothing.
I think you are talking about Patita, the fall from Dwija varna. Hkwever that is something which takes place in life, not beyond it, and that is actually an asystematic movment rather than a natural progression.
All Varna are in end meant to end up as higher varna in next life, if they did their job well enough. I dont drink, i dont watch porn, i dont rape, i read my scripture, safe to say, i work honestly and i end up making money and donating it too to poor, i am good to ascend if i do pass away.
>>136479
Not really. Pitru loka is for all Varna i do agree but it is usually a catch for all who do not end in Swarga. Aitreya did great job explaining it that it is where Aryaman rules, because Swarga was not acessible to them.
This can be easily understood by the war figures. Shivaji was an example is likely in pitruloka not swarga. Safe to say because he fought bravely, but it is not like he was idea human being or anything.
You ideally mobe to next varna in next life because life goes in a grain, as you progress. If you fuck up, you go down the grain. Funny because there are always progressively more V2 thaj V1, more V3 than V2 and more V4 than V3, and so on.
However unless you severely fuck up, a V1 will pretty much end up in just one direction. This ofcourse does still factor him being sinner etc, where it will be a mess, but a V1 can just not be complete douchebag, be an ok guy, and he will end up in Swarga.
Shivaji is the perfect example for being in swarga he protected dharma and fought against adharma.
It is much more stricter for V1 especially for atheists like you.
