>>132453
*Raping pot,
>Raped by Aryans>Raped by Neolithic farmers>Raped by huns>Raped by shweta hunas>Raped by kushans>Raped by Greeks>Raped by persians>Raped by turks>Raped by turco mongols>Raped by afghans>Raped by Brits
>>132449
This guys doesnt even know what he os talking about. Vast numbers of incans and aztecs were killed by the diseases brought by filthy invaders. Small pox absolutely devastated them.
Peeran has ntng to kang about other than controlling the strait, thats about it. This pseudointellectual is blabbing and glazing others while putting his own country down
>>132449
Trvke
Pajeets still think that the whites will accept them cuz they are from Kerala or they are one shade lighter poonjabis. Language kangers dickriding their state mullas or the caste kanger trolling fellow hindoos.
>>132460
Fall of Sindh happened, not because Dahir was weak, it happened cuz his own citizens the buddhists betrayed him.
Prithviraj lost battle of Tarain, because another hindu king Jaichand went against him and sided with Ghori.
Many independent hindoo chiefs from northern India sided with Afghans in the third battle of panipat.
Vijayanagara fall cuz of the two major reasons. The emperor was too kind on muslim sultans, and the two muslim generals betrayed the emperor in an important battle.
Rana Sangha lost the battle of khanwa because he fought in traditional manner, and one of his ally clan (Tomars) joined babur's side.
Every single major battle, that decided the fate of India was lost cuz of stupidity. The jeets either being too kind or they being betrayed by other jeets.
>>132466
Anything except accepting that pajeets had no muscle power, iq, or resultantly any technology to fight against stronger and superior forces.
Babur with a small bandit conquered entirety of north india against hoards of rajujeets getting accked and Their gobars raped.
>>132457
>Vast numbers of incans and aztecs were killed by the diseases brought by filthy invaders.
And why did the opposite not happen. Why were europeans not killed by new world diseases. Ask yourself. He is not wrong.
>>132469
Meh that was a different time. Turkic horse archers had edge over others due to horses. Today mongolia, central asia, afghanistan is irrelevant in terms of military power.
>>132474
Don't be high, lol. That's what babus fed you. If any non jeet country tries to invade pajeetia today, pajeetia will get throughouly raped in and out.
An 8 year muslim old in Kabul could take on 10 hindu adults in a fight kek.
>>132474
He's a pasmanda who got his history knowledge through reels.
Babur himself mentioned how Sangha's army was full of better men, and later he changed his strategy and didn't attack them from front.
>>132474
Also one more fact , at the time of third battle of Panipat, this is exactly what parathas thought. They thought by defeating pajeetified pooghals they could beat afghan forces.
Result? Paratha got Their women sold of <10 rupees in khorasan market.
Also, mind it the era of horse archers were gone.
>>132476
It's called war stategem.
The infantilisation of ancient jeets kings is a recurring theme in any of the right wing historians pov.
T
Abandoning the notion that they were not a good strategists overall.
There's not even a good military strategist even in modern india.
But u r not intellectual enough for that.
Pahadi chiefs sided with Afghans in battle of Panipat. Pahadis were mogging the bacchabaz poothans.
Muslim general of marathis faced the most humiliated defeat in the battle.
Also, later Marathi chiefs raped the rohilla mullas brutally who sided with afghans in the battle.
>>132477
And? Today afghanistan begs india and pakjabis to not destroy them. That was a different time. By the way, durranis were later defeated by sikhs. Pashtroons seethe about losing peshawar to sikhs to this day. Today kpk is part of pak not afghanistan because sikh empire conquered it.
>>132492
Put forward the exception as the norm.
The fact that u had to even give example shows that it's the only one u had.
This is not a bait.
In the realm of possibility there is a miniscule chance that one will defeat another it's a matter of inevitability.
But is it holding out for many other trends ?
It's not.
>>132493
Fuck off pasmande. India has glorious history of conquerors like cholas, lalitaditya, chandragupta. Barring the islamic medieval dark ages when turkic hordes were ravaging not just india but persia, europe, middle east as well, india survived and won.
