>>127809
Never visit an obscure website with your ISP ip, NEVER! All it takes is one anon doing something that attracts the authorities and now all the 20 people that have ever connected to the website are in custody.
>>127819
That's why you must use Tor, it isn't even about anyone here doing something, some outsider may report the conversations here and considering our based beliefs we'll all be the newest distraction on national TV.
>>127830
Dear Pajeet,
Your ISP is mandated to keep records of every IP and domain your IP communicates to for at least 2 years. All they need to do is ask every ISP to give records of every IP that has ever connected to the IP of topchan, the dates when each IP was assigned to a certain customer are all stored, in that manner they can get to everyone who has ever connected to topchan.
>>127849
But that same public IP could potentially be shared by multiple ISP customers at that moment. The ISP distinguishes individual connections using additional information such as port numbers and connection/NAT logs.
So the reply is essentially arguing:
“The website only sees the ISP's shared CGNAT public IP, not necessarily your individual router's unique public IP.”
That's broadly the point. However, CGNAT does not mean you become untraceable to your ISP. If appropriate records exist, the ISP can potentially map the public IP + port + timestamp back through its CGNAT logs to the relevant subscriber. The reply itself is only explaining why the IP visible to a website may not directly correspond one-to-one with your home router.
>>127849
Even if you're in such a topoloy, that isn't a security feature, it is a trick to deal with the limited number of IP addresses. And that CGNAT will still record your private IP and its requests.
>>127853
yeah it has to since packet need to flow both ways, I am just wondering would the isp keep these data as telemetry since it can easily clog their db or whatever they store stuff in
>>127858
Yes, they are legally mandated to, it's standard practice... CGNATs aren't something unique to just Airtel or Jio, almost every major ISP uses them since IPV4 is already exhausted, the only ones who will give individual IPV4 addresses to customers are tier 2 and regional ISPs who still have some IPV4 space available. We all get a unique IPV6 address tho.
>>127906
yeah apparently in india there is a rule to keep 2 years of telemetry, so they somehow have to store it by making less verbose and compressed. anyway for context I have seen companies that only server enterprises couldn't keep logs more than 30days, it would still be in petabytes.
but one things, given with jio/airtel broadbands they have to do double NAT, one at router and another at CGNAT. I don't think they would keep translation at the first hop. it stays at router. in short for glowies to get you they'll get to your house but would need to find who is the culprit at the house itself. would be hard if it is public wifi
>>127936
They can't trace tor, unless they control the site you're visiting, but even in that case you could use vanguards and disable JS. VPN's on the other hand are also mandated to store logs if they want to sell their services in India.
>>127941
7 vpns is still dumb, you can get a vpc from some obscure russian cloud provider and use it as exit node with tailscale, would be much faster and cheaper.
>>127955
All it takes is 1 bored weekend and I will rape some other website in the name of Inch and then all these fags will be in custody keks, I've never connected here from a real IP.
>>127973
It already does. I'm pretty sure connecting to a blacklist of websites from your real IP puts you on a list. In which case I'm pretty high up on there.
