The more I read about Gupta Era, the more I want to go back.... It reads as if it was a different country all together... most pajeets don't understand just how far we have fallen... lundia back then dominated art, culture and engineering.
>Samudragupta defeated 9 kings in Northern India (Aryavarta) and 12 kings in Southern India (Dakshinapatha), alongside numerous frontier states and forest tribes.> His extensive military victories are famously detailed by his court poet Harisena in the Allahabad Pillar Inscription (Prayag Prashasti).
Everything was just so... interesting and based back then...
>According to the eminent historian R.C. Majumdar, the architectural and artistic advancements during the Gupta Empire reached a peak of classical maturity, prompting his famous evaluation: "It can be rightly said for Gupta artists that they adorned whatever they touched."
>>118875
Centuries of Islamist destruction and then European Colonisation left pajeets completely mind raped and demoralised.
Most of them don't even know just how Brvtal all of it was, entire cities were lost
>>118885
All the true Biharis— who were responsible for the Mauryan Empire, shunga empire, etc migrated to the north. And settled in Punjab and Haryana and in the mountains. Bihari population was replaced by Dalits
>>118884
They (Islamists) also created butiful cities too.
The history is not black and white both of the time period had their good and bad moments.
Even the British if u leave indians aside the architectural design of that time is still relevant today. But this gangu teli is not mature enough for that conversation yet.
>>118913
The Guptas were from Eastern UP, nobody would call them kalaa abbo cuz they weren't ones, they were either Brahmins or Kshatriyas, that is what the proof shows.
>>118913
It is not the skin that matters but the spirit, if your spirit is pure you are more Arya than the average Librand who drinks infant blood to clean his skin.
>>118920
>Brahmins or Kshatriyas
All the kings back then including naarthie ones were exclusively kaalu, ancient paintings support this. You ain't white lil bro.
>>118924
There are literally no "ancient paintings" from this time bruh, only inscriptions and coins.
Do you not know that paintings get spoiled over years? It takes lots of chemical treatment to maintain them, and most of these methods were invented only in recent past.
>>118922
Arey how do you know? It is common sense. IVC chads migrated eastward and settled around gangetic plains YOU FUCKING NIGGER DON'T REPLY TO ME WITH YOUR SARKARI SCHOOL CHAAP CERTIFICATE.
>>118930
No proof for that, academic consensus is either Brahmin or Kshatriya, the proof is one the conclusions two.
Samudragupta married off his grand daughter to Brahmin (confirmed) Vakataka Prince
Chandragupta married kshatriya (confirmed) princess of Lichhavi.
Based on these two facts, they were either Brahmins or Kshatriyas.
>>118947
kek, centuries down from now, anons will post ramayana movie scenes showing suparnakha mogging sita, they will conclude that sita and ram were the real abbos while ravan and lankans were aryans.
>>118950
Nope, Gupta Era changed India, nothing remains of Mauryans except the lion symbol, in terms of art, literature, architecture and culture nothing is there to show for.
The Iron Pillar was constructed during Chandragupta's rule, it symbolises Engineering prowess.
It was during Gupta Era that the paini compiled his work on grammar, the temple architecture was standardised, Samudragupta is literally the most successful warrior in entire history.
>>118955
It is the fact anon, you can search it.
>>118961
>It is the fact anon, you can search it.
the only evidence that show they were brahmins is because of the marital ties with brahmin and for the Kshatriyas because they used to preform asmavedha or other vedic rituals. not to mention during that point the the caste system was not rigidified unlike today. Vaishya fits perfect in all cases.
