Any developed country which has decently sized population has homogenous society which leads to high trust and less corruption(feeling of other peeps as your people).
India mein caste , region , religion , teeno hai jab tak yeh teeno eradicate nhi honge tabh tak india will never industrialize and develop.
>>11896
Jab tak general obc ko discriminate karenge tabh tak chude rahega india , agar general obc mil gaye toh majority achieve hojaye rest ko sariya kardo.
>>11910
Israel is ethnically diverse, they are united through judaism.
>>11909
US was united through white race and Christianity. And the first settlers were from selected ethnicities, and they still control USA, WASPs.
>>11915
>Israel is ethnically diverse, they are united through judaism.
Nope. Its an ashkenazi and sephardic jew country. Rest all are lower caste minorities.
>>11876
>Any developed country which has decently sized population has homogenous society which leads to high trust and less corruption.
None of that matters if its an inferior race. Nigger countries are homogenous yet poor barbaric shitholes.
>caste
Based thing. Not everyone can be of equal socioeconomic status. Society can't function without hierarchy.
>religion
Its only one religion that causes issue here and i dont need to mention it.
>region
Expected of a subcontinent sized country.
>>11935
No country is completely homogenous except for japan and korea. Israel is still nowhere as diverse. It is an ashkenazim sephardic jew project. Rest all are their servants.
>>11910
That's why UC secessionism is the first step, and the Dalits know it, hence why they created BJP to brainwash UCs with Dalit Republic nationalism
>>11968
Not completely homogenous. Uk has irish, welsh, scots, english. In germany, northern germany is culturally and linguistically quite different from southern alpine regions like bavaria. Yes they are closer to each other than to some nigger or jeet but homogenity itself isnt as important. Its the quality of race that matters. You can have a homogenous nigger nation and it will still be shit due to average 80 iq demographic.
>>11964
You are wrong most african countries are hetrogenous they have caste and shit(all are shit btw).Its the same as indians they have different ethnicity and castes , do me a favour and ask chat gpt top 30 hetrogenous nations in the world with decent sized population , you would see yourself.
Also , caste system is based but caste by birth is stupid , if i was dictator i would setup caste based discriminatory system on the basis of profession.
And for region , having a fedral government would be nice.
>>11966>>11964
They are practically homogenous with 70 to 80 percent of population belonging to one group rest are other but similar.
Scot and english are practically the same its like JAT and RAJPUT.
BUT IN INDIA you got nai , rajput , bania , , , yadav , gujjar , rabari ,vishwakarma , dalit , dalits dalit , brahmin etc etc
>>11975
When you are sub80 iq bantus you find any reason to fight. The countries are homogenous. Bantu languages and cultures are very similar. Their tribalism and inability to work together is a consequence of them being dumh niggers.
>caste by birth is stupid.
Well you are the one who is stupid. There was never some database in existence in history that assigned and recorded your caste. Castes were autonomous entities. No one is stopped dalits from starting their own business along with their bretheren and to practice nepotism. They couldn't because they were low iq only good for sandas cleaning just like it is today.
>>11984
In my opinion a shudra (not dalit) from states like jammu , himachal etc performs better then brahmin from bihar.
This is the main reason why caste based on birth does not make sense.
>>11977
>IN INDIA you got nai , rajput , bania , , , yadav , gujjar , rabari ,vishwakarma , dalit , dalits dalit , brahmin.
In west you got WASPs, jews, upper class, working class and underclass.
In Skorea you got powerful business families (Chaebols) that hold monopoly. In middle east tribal hierarchies exists. Caste exists in every society. Its just informal and less talked about. I can concede that western caste/class system is less elaborate than ours as they are more individualistic but i see no point in taking them as role models given their very individualism, liberalism is cucking their countries with immigration.
>>11985
Infact i know a lohar (pakistan punjabi migrant)
His grandfather was subedar major , jis dad was army major, he himself is lt cdr in navy.
They are doing way more then rajput of fucking gujrat , up ,bihar,mp .
>>11985
Shudra? Yes. Dalits? Hell nah.
Dalits are basically the waste of society.
I don't know what you mean by they perform better, but biharis brahmins have many achievements. Many looks ugly because they are poor, the rich ones look fine.
Anyway caste system is bullshit. Your tribe should learn to adopt.
Patidars were mere peasants in past, shudras, but now they are doing better than many uppercastes. They shaped their own culture i.e religious sect, follow swaminarayan sampradaya and are vegetarian.
>>11985
As i said, there was never some database in history recording and assigning people castes. Castes/jatis were autonomous kin bodies or guilds. Their power or prestige depended on status they held in their regions.
