Chamars only cherrypick occassional individual cases of assholes being assholes and never show you the other side. All his closest friends were UCs. So much for muh gorillion year oppression.
>>112669
What is funny, is Saha are "Baishya" (Vaisya) community. However due to lack of proper varna system this got very muddy. The elitist society which came due to kayastha cucks refusing the shudra title after crawling back from chuddism like oppurtunistic fag they are, and lack of Kshatriyas after fall of sena dynasty, it created a two segment division of UC and LC. The Saha are Dwijas, kekda, chamars try to kang on a bania.
>>112694
He himself is a UC kekda
>Anthropological studies indicate that the surname "Saha" or "Shaha" is linguistically derived from the Sanskrit word Sādhu-bānik.
Banik is large framework of all of the Vaishya community, before buddhist rule in bengal raped the merchants and made it slavs to muslims for most part of history, until war with pathan and continued support of maan singh
>Over centuries, Sadhu colloquially mutated into Sahu and eventually Saha in Bengal, it functions explicitly assigned to the Vaishya varna in classical Hindu texts—the community adopts this etymology as internal evidence of their Baishya status.>Historical Shifts according to historians like Jyotirmoyee Sarma, prior to the 7th or 8th century A.D., Bengal's economy was heavily reliant on global maritime trade.
Now notice what changed when the buddhist chamars started to leave it later. Which led us to Kayasthas of india.
>During the 11th century, Bengal was a global epicenter of Mahayana and Vajrayana (Tantric) Buddhism under the royal patronage of the Pala Empire>During this era, merchant classes enjoyed highly elevated, prestigious positions in society, aligning closely with traditional Vaishya privileges.
Notice carefully how and when it all went wrong here
>Under the Sena and Varman dynasties in 11th to 12th centuries, the social structure under. King Ballal Sen famously reclassified many merchant groups (such as the Subarnabaniks and ancestral trading groups).
This was right after the first migration of native brahmins away from entite region, without which the entite varna system failed to exist. The non Dwija like Kayastha kept pushing for bhadra lol meme unity, when reality majority of Baniks would be higher than them in ritual.
>Consequently, medieval texts like the Brihaddharma Purana excluded them from the upper tier, placing them in ritual hierarchies categorized under Shudra sub-castes, despite their continued wealth.
Their is only two way this ended up yhis way took place, after indegenious brahmin and ineage keepers migrated away from bengal from 11th to 13th of AD, most people took buddhism and those who did so cant enjoy old dwija privileges. Sucks for them, for rest it was due to lack of varna system not due to it. You have a problem, then go to buddhist and their hate for baniyas.
