This is increasingly true for even lundia now, you will be grinding your ass in some gobarmint advice while your love marriage wife goes on dates with her "platonic" male friends lmao
>>100109
Well if lundia also degenerates we will see the same. When men have nothing worth dying for be it gynocratic government, modern women, most men would give up on soyciety and become hedonists.
>>100117
not really lundia is poor af at the same time, no one has money to be a hedonist, what will follow will be the worst nightmare of all the rendis
what happens in a poor fag turd world shithole with huge young male population which has nothing to loose anymore? hope you get the gist.
>>100117
Kek!! Do u seriously think that the elites pushing towards feminism did not factor this ??
They did and the answer is drone warfare.
Young men only need to be tamed and feminized so that they can be a goycatlle. C'mon man stop underestimating the elites nigga.
>>100144
This nigga thinks lundian men will do something??
Bitch the history of India is filled with a millennia of slavery.
The young men will take it head on and be a good goyim and surrender.
U people do not understand how unique the independence movement was.
>>100144
>he doesn't know poor jeets have far better sex lives.
Those daily wage workers you see fuck cheap randis daily.
>>100170
>Muh millennia of slavery.
A few centuries of foreign rule is not literal slavery, pajeet. By that logic literally every country was enslaved and we defeated mughals on our own much before brits btw.
>>100241
Bahadur Shah Zafar was the face of first war of independence and where were the peshwas ??
Oh right sucking british boots against mysore nawaab.
Nigga u thinking that a change is nigh upon us is delusional ok.
The future will be terrible for us is what I was saying.
No great man will ever help us.
As they say "u will own nothing and u will be happy" type shit.
>>100170
>how unique the independence movement was.
it was not unique at all faggot
the Europeans had ruled enough and made a lot of wealth and ruling over colonies was not profitable anymore at that point.
like 50 or so colonies were 'freed' in that period, there is nothing unique about pajeetia independence in '47
or are you a total normie who believes that pajeetia got freedom because of gandhi, savarkar, bhagat singh, rebellion, salt march, simon go back, etc etc
>>100248
I meant for indians rising up for themselves.
>>100251
Aagaya ek aur chutiya do u get this talking points in some whatsapp forward??
Didn't u get ur independence in 2014 ??
Shut the fuck up nigga and go back to being a chamar.
>Calls himself Middle class is actually poorfag.
Why does pajeets do this ??
>>100246
>Bahadur Shah Zafar was the face of first war of independence.
That was a meme. Revolt of 1857 was very limited and bahadur shah zafar was a mere figurehead. Marathas would have uprooted mughals at delhi long ago if they did not depend on them for legitimacy among northern muslim nawabs so they chose to make mughals their puppets instead.
>sucking british boots.
Tf you yapping? A section of peshwas and marathas did rebel nana saheb tatya tope rani laxmibai.
But as i said scope was limited. Most people were actually complacent with british rule. Dont let deshbhakti propaganda delude you. Yes british rule was not the best but it did bring stability and tech. Indian population even increased marginally during british rule and barring bengal famine not even a single famine occurred post 1900 thanks to famine codes made by brits. Many indians were ok with british rule hence the freedom struggle was more like non violent activism instead of outright uprising.
>>100272
sit down
Jew means someone who is a Jew
Goy means someone who is not a Jew
Goyim is the plural of Goy, so Goys essentially
your original sentence
>i turned into a Goyim after 2014
let us say you meant
>i turned into a Goy after 2014
This implies that you were Jew earlier, who turned into a non Jew, i.e., Goy in 2014
learn what words mean
>>100268
>Rewrites history as we speak.
Ok boomer.
>Dont let deshbhakti propaganda delude you
Nigga i know British gave more just laws than even some nawabs gave to muslims or abolishing of sati despite hurting religious sentiments.and also provided education equality ( to those who could afford)
>did bring stability and tech.
Agreed a single loom outproduce entire villages. That was new then true.
>But famines were rampant>People genuinely were against British>The congress rewrote it but there were many violent parts of the story too.
>>100273
Kek!! Can't believe this faggotry that I'm seeing all of us are goyims nigga.
>A goy teaching another goy the meaning of goy
Truly this chappal forum showed me everything I can see.
Kekekeke.
>>100276
Most indians were complacent with british rule, pajeet. You can't rule for 200 years if you were so hated. Congress led independence movement was just activism for greater representation and protectionism which culminated in transfer of power when brits were too exhausted to rule after ww2. It was all a nothingburger. Many people, industrialists even made fortune during british rule but soycialist congress ruined it. Independence came at a price for such folks.
And no famines were not rampant lol. Famine codes put an end to famines after 1900.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Famine_Codeshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Famine_Codes
